| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5050 2024 SLD 5050 2024 SCMR 1567 2024 SCP 210 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Crl.P.L.A.340/2024
PRESENT: Mr. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail Mrs. Justice Ayesha A. Malik Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Muhammad Amir Malik, AOR along with petitioner For the State : Mr. Irfan Zia, Additional Prosecutor General, Punjab Abdul Sami, SDPO Sargodha M. Sami Jan, I.O For the Complainant : Mr. Shahid Tabassum, ASC. Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR Date of Hearing : 03.06.2024
Crl.P.L.A.340/2024
PRESENT: Mr. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail Mrs. Justice Ayesha A. Malik Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Muhammad Amir Malik, AOR along with petitioner For the State : Mr. Irfan Zia, Additional Prosecutor General, Punjab Abdul Sami, SDPO Sargodha M. Sami Jan, I.O For the Complainant : Mr. Shahid Tabassum, ASC. Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR Date of Hearing : 03.06.2024
Muhammad Anwar …Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
The State & another …Respondent(s)
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 489-F
JUDGMENT Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, J.Through the present petition, the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order of Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 29.01.2024, (Impugned Order) whereby the pre-arrest bail has been declined to him in FIR No.1002 dated 17.10.2023 registered under Section 489-F PPC at the Police Station City Sargodha. 2. According to the gist of the aforesaid FIR lodged by Muhammad Pervaiz Ali Hassan (complainant), on 08.06.2023 the brother-in-law of the complainant purchased the property from the accused through the complainant. The complainant in this regard made a payment of Rs. 20,00,000/- to the petitioner in the presence of witnesses and in return, the petitioner/accused Muhammad Anwar issued a cheque bearing number 02559350 of his account before the witnesses in favour of the complainant. That on the petitioner's demand, the complainant also gave him Rs.2,00,000/-. Subsequently, the petitioner failed to complete the transaction therefore the complainant demanded back his amount and compensation. On the specified date, complainant deposited the cheque in question in the account for its encashment but the same was dishonoured due to a dormant account. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case with mala fide intention and ulterior motives; that the petitioner sold the house to the brother-in-law of the complainant namely Attique and the cheque in question has been given as a guarantee and this fact has already been mentioned in the agreement; that the complainant has no nexus whatsoever with the petitioner; that the petitioner has already instituted a civil suit regarding the agreement in question before the civil court as he is the owner and in possession of the plot in question as per the said agreement and the complainant has registered a false and frivolous case against accused. 4. The learned law officer assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. They contend…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492