| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5051 2024 SLD 5051 2024 PCRLJ 1196 |
Criminal Criminal Appeal No. 300 of 2023, decided on 22nd January, 2024.
Before Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Babar Sattar, JJ.
Haseeb Hassan for Appellant. Rana Zulfiqar Ali, Special Prosecutor, ANF and Mohammad Bashir Khan, P.S. ANF, I.C.T for the State. Date of hearing: 11th January, 2024
AL-BARAKA BANK (Pvt.) Ltd. through Authorized Representative--Appellant
VERSUS
The STATE---Respondent
Law: Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997
Section: 9, 33, 48 & 74
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)---
----Ss. 9, 33, 48 & 74---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.516A---Recovery of narcotic substance---Possession of vehicle---Bank, claim of--- Appellant bank sought recovery of possession of vehicle in question which was seized by authorities as case property---Validity---Appellant bank was legal title holder of vehicle in question pursuant to provisions of Musharakah Agreement or loan agreement---Purpose of repossession by bank was not to put the vehicle to ordinary use but to sell the vehicle to recover funds involved in purchase of the vehicle and/or that were due and payable by the person who had leased / rented the vehicle from the bank---Such purpose could not be achieved during pendency of trial as vehicle could not be disposed of when it was released on Superdari---Provisions of Ss.33 & 74 of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, when read together with S.516A, Cr.P.C., did not contemplate release of a vehicle on Superdari during pendency of trial to enable a financial institution to effect recovery of funds through the sale of such vehicle--- Trial Court rightly denied release of vehicle on Superdari to appellant-bank as the vehicle was yet to be exhibited as case property in a pending trial---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492