| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 4187 2024 PLJ 559 , 2024 SLD 4187 |
Appellate Jurisdiction
C.A. No. 1471 of 2013 & 53 of 2014, 187 to 191 of 2018 & C.M.A. No. 5008 of 2014 in C.A. No. 1471 of 2013, decided on 8.4. 2032
Present: Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Ms. Musarrat Hilali, JJ.
Mr. Haider Mehmood Mirza, ASC Along with Petitioner in person (Through video link Lahore) for Petitioner. Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor General, Punjab for State. Mr. Qaiser Abbas s/o M. Shafi deceased for Complainant.
C.A. No. 1471 of 2013 & 53 of 2014, 187 to 191 of 2018 & C.M.A. No. 5008 of 2014 in C.A. No. 1471 of 2013, decided on 8.4. 2032
Present: Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Ms. Musarrat Hilali, JJ.
Mr. Haider Mehmood Mirza, ASC Along with Petitioner in person (Through video link Lahore) for Petitioner. Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor General, Punjab for State. Mr. Qaiser Abbas s/o M. Shafi deceased for Complainant.
IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN alias KHAROO--Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE--Respondent
Law: Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975 (V of 1976)--
Section: 2, 8
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Modification in master plan--Legality--Creation of new plots--Writ petition--Allowed--Cancellation of plots--Challenge to--The four plots, which had been allotted, for residential purposes in a residential area, and in making such allotments neither any law nor Master Plan was violated--Neither Single Judge nor learned Judges of Division Bench of High Court realized that only one private allottee, was arrayed as a respondent before High Court in WP--The Master Plan, layout plans and Google map which had been filed show location of said plots, which are at end of Street No. 56 and on right side there was a narrow lane separating last plot of one of respondents from Plot No. 295-A whereas last plot of a respondent on other side of street was separated from Plot No. 296-A with a twenty-foot wide lane--Therefore, there is no question of obstruction of light and air--The term ‘Future Use’ did not mean that land was to be left open nor did it mean that it is to be used for amenity purposes, which may, had prohibited their allotment--Regretfully, these points were not considered by Judges of High Court--Those petitions were converted into appeals and allowed--Petition disposed of. [Pp. 636, 637 & 638] A, B, C & D Mr. Muhammad Nazir Jawwad, ASC for Petitioners (in CP No. 993 of 2014). Mr. Muhammad Munir Paracha, ASC for Petitioners (in CP 1117/2014). Malik Nasrullah Awan, ASC a/w Ms. Mehnaz Nadeem, Respondent-4 and Syed Shozab Zamir son of Respondent No. 7 for Respondents No. 1 to 8 (in CP No. 993/2014). Malik Nasrullah Awan, ASC a/w for Respondents No. 2 to 9 (in CP 1117/2014). Nemo for Applicants (in CMA No. 7061 of 2016). Date of hearing: 13.5.2024. Order Qazi Faez Isa, CJ.--Eight petitioners had filed a writ petition (WP No. 4191 of 2013) before the Islamabad High Court against Capital Development Authority (‘CDA’), the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency and Ch. Tahir Sattar. They alleged that ‘CDA has illegally, unlawfully changed the Master Plan and created new Plots No. 295-A to 295-H and 296-A to 296-B in the closed end Street No. 56, Sector F-11/4, Islamabad’ (‘the said plots) and had sought a declaration…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492