Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- -- S. 2(xxiv)-"Settlement"-Settlement providing payment of gratuity appearing to be quite fair-Contention that settlement having been arrived at during Martial Law period could not be acted upon Settlement, held, covered by definition under S. 2(xxix) and was binding upon parties Razzak for Appellant. Mahmood Mubassir for Respondent. JUDGMENT This is an appeal against an award dated 1st August 1972, whereby the learned Chairman of the Second Sind Labour Court Karachi, ordered the respondent to be paid all his dues, including gratuity as was described in his affidavit. The learned Court also ordered the payment of Rs. 500 as compensation on the ground that the appellant way avoiding to pay gratuity to the respondent on untenable grounds for a period of more than 2 years Mr. Abdul Razzak, the learned Representative for the appellant, contended that the settlement dated llth August 1969, cannot be acted upon, as it was arrived at during the Martial Law period. I (.to not see much force in this contention. I have gone through the settlement. It A appears to be a fair settlement. It is a settlement within the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492