| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 3958 2024 SLD 3958, 2024 PLD 339 |
Constitution Petition No. D-192 of 2023, decided on 28th November, 2023.
Before Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Jawad Akbar Sarwana, JJ
Director, KMC---Petitioner
VERSUS
PRESIDING OFFICER, IX AD&SJ, EAST, KARACHI and 2 others--Respondents
Law: Sindh Civil Court Rules,
Section: R - 44
Sindh Civil Court Rules---
----R. 44---Sindh Local Government Act (XLII of 2013), S. 126---Legal Advisors and Government Pleaders---Memo of appearance, filing of---Non-filing of Vakalatnama---Petitioner/Karachi Metropolitan Corporation was aggrieved of the order passed by Lower Appellate Court returning Memo of Appearance and giving directions to file proper Vakalatnama---Validity---Advocates who appear for a private party file Vakalatnama and, in contrast, Advocates appearing on behalf of Government put in a Memo of Appearance---Such practice of Government Pleader filing Memo of Appearance instead of Vakalatnama is also consistent with the provisions of R. 44 of Sindh Civil Court Rules---Order of petitioner Corporation was in line with the statutory requirements for issuing such orders as laid down in S. 126 of Sindh Local Government Act, 2013---There was no lacuna in the order of petitioner Corporation---Once the Court had assessed that a Memo of Appearance submitted by petitioner Corporation was in line with the provisions of Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, the Court should have accepted the same---High Court directed Lower Appellate Court to accept Memo of Appearance from the empaneled Advocate of petitioner Corporation subject to scrutiny as per law---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492