| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 3954 2024 SLD 3954, 2024 SCMR 1479 2024 SCP 221 |
Criminal Petition No.239 of 2024, decided on 5th June, 2024. (Against the order dated 04.03.2024, passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No.69212-B of 2023).
Present: Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Ayesha A. Malik and Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, JJ
Mrs. Zill-e-Huma, ASC For the State : Mr. Rashdeen Nawaz Kasuri, Additional Attorney General for Pakistan Mr. Irfan Zia, Additional Prosecutor General, Punjab Naeem Sajid, Inspector, FIA, Lahore Ms. Huma Noreen Hassan, Legal Consultant Pak Railways For the Complainant : Mian Sohail Anwar, ASC Date of Hearing : 05.06.2024
ADNAN SHAFAI---Petitioner
VERSUS
The STATE and another---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: S. 497(1), third proviso,, Ss. 161, 162, 109 & 409-. /S.5(2)
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section:
Law: Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----S. 497(1), third proviso---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 161, 162, 109 & 409--Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Public servant taking gratification by corrupt or illegal means, abetment, criminal breach of trust by public servant, criminal misconduct---Bail, grant of--Statutory ground of delay in conclusion of trial---Present case did not involve any crime punishable by death---Petitioner (accused) was arrested on 05.08.2022 and was behind the bars since then---Charge in the case was framed on 12.06.2023 and yet the trial had not been concluded---Grant of bail on the statutory ground of delay in the conclusion of trial was a right of accused unless such delay had been occasioned as a result of his own conduct---Only ground on the basis of which the petitioner's application for bail was dismissed was that petitioner moved an application under Section 265-K, Cr.P.C---However, the same did not reflect any design, pattern, or concerted effort by the petitioner to delay the conclusion of trial--An application for the protection of the accused's rights and for fair trial guaranteed under Article 10-A of the Constitution did not amount to any design, pattern, or concerted effort by the accused to delay the trial---Thus, merely moving an application under Section 265-K, Cr.P.C does not amount to deliberate delay on the part of the accused in conclusion of trial---In the present case only one application was moved and after that no adjournment was sought by the counsel for the accused on the relevant date of hearing---In such view a case of statutory ground of delay in the conclusion of trial was prima facie made out within the remit of Section 497, Cr.P.C.---Petition was converted into an appeal and allowed, and the petitioner was granted post-arrest bail.
Shakeel Shah v. State and others 2022 SCMR 1 ref.
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492