| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 3420 2024 SLD 3420 = 2024 PTD 1174 |
S.T.R. NO. 03-P of 2015 with C.Ms. Nos.3, 5 of 2015, 40, 35 of 2019 and 12 of 2021, decided on 18th October, 2023. Date of hearing: 18th October, 2023.
PRESENT: ABDUL SHAKOOR AND SYED ARSHAD ALI, JJ
Ghulam Shoaib Jally along with Sharif Ullah (Assistant Director Legal) for Petitioners. Hussain Ahmad Sherazi and Mouzzam Ali Butt for
Respondent
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR
VS
Messrs PESHAWAR ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (PESCO), SHAMI ROAD, PESHAWAR
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990, Law Reforms ACT, 1977
Section: 2(35),3,7,8,8(i)(a),36,36(3),47,74, 25
(a) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--Ss.3, 7, 47 & 74-Notification SRO 480(I)/2007 dated 99-06-2007- Reference-Input adjustment-Extension in time-Respondent / Peshawar Electric Supply Company was issued with show cause notice relating to inadmissible input adjustment by the Company-Matter was decided by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue in favour of respondent / Company-Validity-Notification SRO 480(I)/2007 dated 09-06-2007 was issued under S.74 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and was not without jurisdiction-Extension of time as per verbiage of S.74 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 was time bound and the Legislature itself had not restricted jurisdiction of Federal Board of Revenue relating to extension of time even after the period which had lapsed-Input adjustment was linked with taxable supply which meant economic / taxable activities carried out by any person whether or not for profit and included an activity carried on by it that involved supply of goods and anything done or undertaken during commencement or termination of economic activity-Respondent / Electric Company paid sales tax at the time of purchasing taxable goods, therefore the tax remained with revenue as a trust which was adjustable by the company at the time of its output tax payable by respondent / Electric Company in course of taxable activities-Even if the electricity was lost either on account of pilferage or at the time of distribution which was a natural process as electricity passing through wires was certainly lost due to technical issues, however, such activity of respondent / Electric Company did not fall within the mischief of taxable activities-Respondent / Electric Company was entitled to input adjustment of sales tax paid at the time of purchasing taxable goods against electricity produced by it however the same was lost either on account of pilferage, distribution losses or technical reasons-High Court declined to interfere in judgment passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue-Reference was disposed of accordingly.Asad Ali and others v. The Bank of Punjab and others PLD 2020 SC 736; Province of Punjab v. Muhammad Arif & Co. PLD 2022 Lah. 596; Subedar Sardar Khan through Legal heirs and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492