Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 3397 2023 SLD 3397 2023 PTD 1046 (2024) 130 TAX 124
Lahore High Court
I.T.R. No.77610 of 2022, decided on 7th June, 2023.
Present: Shahid Karim and Anwaar Hussain, JJ
Ibrar Ahmad for Applicant. Aqib Ali for
Respondent.

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE

VS

PUNJAB MEDICAL STORE

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Section: 153, 161, 133,133(5),136,153(1)(a),161,161(1),161( 1B),161(2),205

Law: Income Tax Rules, 2002

Section: 44,44(4)

-Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----Ss. 153 & 161---Income Tax Rules, 2002, R. 44---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Payments for goods, services and contracts---Statement of tax collected or deducted---Scope---Department noted that payments were made to various persons by the respondent but no proof of tax deduction in terms of S. 153(1)(a) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was provided and taking cognizance of the default of withholding tax provisions, notice under R.44(4) of the Income Tax Rules, 2002 was issued, which was not responded by the taxpayer and resultantly after issuing show-cause notice and affording multiple opportunities of hearing, order-in-original was passed and a tax demand was raised---Appeal preferred before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed, however, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal---Validity---Taxpayer was a prescribed person, obligated to deduct tax while making payments against purchases in terms of S. 153(1)(a)---Appellate Tribunal on the one had held that default of tax deduction for the tax year concerned stood established and on the other hand it had been held that the recipients of the payments had filed their returns, therefore, the Assessing Officer was not justified to create the impugned tax demand that appeared to be a self-contradictory finding---Respondent had not brought on record any proof of payment of the amount due by the recipients of the payments from the respondent, before the forums below and, therefore, mere filing of the returns by the said recipients was not sufficient to establish that the tax due was actually paid---Respondent could not be absolved from its statutory obligation to collect and deposit the tax as withholding agent---Reference application was allowed. ORDER: This reference application under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ("the Ordinance") is directed against order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Lahore Bench, Lahore ("the Tribunal"), wherein following question of law has been formulated, for our opinion: "Whether the impugned order of the learned ATIR is legally sustainable and justified interpretation and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492