Case Details

Citation(s)
1976 SLG 772 1976 SLD 772 1976 PLC 376
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 186 of 1975, decided on 16th June 1975.
RAI ABDUR RAZZAQUE KHAN, PRESIDING OFFICER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SABIR HUSSAIN

VS

RACHNA TEXTILE MILLS

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial dispute- ---Domestic enquiry-Composite enquiry on two separate charge ­sheet-Not objectionable in absence of any prejudice to accused. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- ----S. 2(xii) read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. O. 15­Hunger strike by one worker inciting others to riotous behaviour and stoppage of work and affecting smooch functioning of factory­ falls under definition of "illegal strike"-Workmen, in circumstances, held, rightly charged of misconduct. Sadiq Muhammad Waraich for Petitioner. Raja Muhammad Akbar for Respondent. ORDER This is an appeal preferred against an order dated 17-3-75 passed by the learned Presiding Officer Junior Labour Court, Rawalpindi on a petition under section 25-A filed by the appellant. His petition was dismissed, hence this appeal. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and have gone through the record of the Junior Labour Court as well as the impugned order. 3. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that appellant admittedly went on hunger strike from 11-5-1974 to 18-5-1974 outside the main gate of the mills. Again he took gave for 15 minutes on 19-5-1974, but did not turn up for the whole day. An enquiry was held and he was dismissed from service. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has stressed that two separate charge-sheets were given to the appellant but only one enquiry was held for both the misconducts. This is not warranted by law. Learned counsel for the appellant has failed to support his contention by any law or care-law what­soever. No prejudice was caused to the appellant and he never agitated this matter before the Junior Labour Court as well as in his grounds of appeal. In para. 5 of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492