Case Details

Citation(s)
1976 SLG 721 1976 SLD 721 1976 PLC 242
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Application No. 116 of 1972, decided on 20th November 1974.
MAHMOOD ALI SHAH BUKHARI, PRESIDING OFFICER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

ZAFARULLAH KHAN

VS

ESSO PAKISTAN FERTILIZER Co. LTD., KARACHI

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- ----S. 34 read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. O. 18 -Redress of individual worker's grievance-Two remedies available to workman-Application either under S. O. 18 of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 or under S. 36 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969--Adherence to provisions of S. O. 18 (repealed and replaced by S. 25-A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969) mandatory in either case - Limitation prescribed under S. O. 18, held, applicable even to application under S. 34, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. 1973 P L C 1, 1971 P L C 157, 1972 P L C 261, 1972 P L C 416, 1972 P L C 353,1972 P L C 576,1972 P L C 27 and1972 P L C 60rel. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 65(B) [as amended by labour Laws (Amendment) Ordinance (IX of 1972), S. 65(B) prospective and not retrospective-Provisions of S. 5, Limitation Act, 1.908 made applicable under Ordinance but not applicable to application filed prior to addition of S. 65(8)-Law prevailing at titre of filing of application, held, applicable and pro­visions of S. 5, Limitation Act, 1908, not applicable to application filed prior to addition of S. 65(B)-Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5. P L D 1967 Kar. 445 and P L D 1968 Kar. 107 rel. (c) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- ----S. 34 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5-Limitation­Condonation of delay-Application for condonation not filed alongwith main application but presented after about 21 years on plea of illness of counsel-No medical certificate produced-Conduct of applicant suggesting endeavour to deliberately suppress fact of delay­ Condonation of delay, in circumstances, held, not justified. P L D 1961 Kar. 231, A I R 1929 Sind 206, A I R 1914 All. 521 and A I R 1910 Pat. 336 rel. (d) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- --- S.34--- Individual workman challenging termination of service­--Application framed in nature of declaratory suit-Application, held, not competent-Section 34 can be invoked for enforcement of guaranteed or secured right…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492