| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1986 SLG 130 1986 SLD 130 1986 PTD 866 (1986) 54 TAX 138 1987 PTCL 94 |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
I.T. A. No. 754/IB of 1985-86, decision dated: 26-08-1986, hearing DATE : 9-07-1986
MUHAMMAD MAZHAR ALI, CHAIRMAN
Tahir Latif Sheikh, D.R. for Appellant.
Respondent in person
I.T. A. No. 754/IB of 1985-86, decision dated: 26-08-1986, hearing DATE : 9-07-1986
MUHAMMAD MAZHAR ALI, CHAIRMAN
Tahir Latif Sheikh, D.R. for Appellant.
Respondent in person
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 10
Income-tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---S. 10--Levy of surcharge- -Jaria (Jem Setter)--Person who derived income from setting Jems in ornaments' on receipt of labour charges, held, not a person engaged in business of manufacturing and sale of gad and silver ornaments--Levy of surcharge in case of a jem setter was, therefore, wholly misconceive d--Jaria could not be treated or held to be a jeweller so as to be visited with levy of surcharge on his income. ORDER This departmental appeal pertains to charge year 1984-85. It seeks to call in question the order of the learned Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Range ' B' Multan whereby he has deleted the levy of surcharge on the assessee-respondent by treating him to be not a manufacturer of gold and silver ornaments. The assessee filed return declaring total income of Rs.18,100. While processing it under section 59 (1) of the Income-tax Ordinance, 1979, the Income-tax Officer levied surcharge @ 6% on total income. On appeal, the learned Appellate Assistant Commissioner deleted the levy of surcharge. His order is reproduced below: "Scrutiny of the relevant record reveals that the appellant is a Jaria 'Gem Setter' and not a manufacturer which fact is also proved from the A.A.C-B Range's Order Nos.2020 and 2021, dated 9-5-1984. As the appellant is a Jaria by profession, levy of jewellers surcharge is, therefore, ordered to be deleted." 2. Relying upon a single Bench decision of the Appellate Tribunal assed in I.T.A. No.885/LB/83-84, dated 17-4-1985 the learned Departmental Representative contended that gem setting is a process of manufacturing of ornaments and, therefore, the assessee-respondent as rightly subjected to levy of surcharge. The learned authorities representative of assessee-respondent, on the other hand, submitted hat assessee derives income from setting gems in the ornaments made jewellers on payment of labour charges only. 3. Upon perusal of the abovereferred orders of my learned brother he Judicial Member (Mr. Abrar Hussain Naqvi) I find that he has, in his order, dated 17-4-1984 (supra) held that "the gem setting is a part of manufacturing process". whereas in his latter order, dated 23-1-1985 passed in…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492