| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1989 SLG 33 1989 SLD 33 1989 PTD 256 (1988) 57 TAX 182 |
Calcutta High Court
Income-tax Reference No.52 of 1984, decision dated: 14th July,1986
DIPAK KUMAR SEN AND MRS. MONJULA BOSE, JJ
D. Pal and Miss M. Seal for the Assessee. B.K. Bagchi and B.K. Naha for the Commissioner
Income-tax Reference No.52 of 1984, decision dated: 14th July,1986
DIPAK KUMAR SEN AND MRS. MONJULA BOSE, JJ
D. Pal and Miss M. Seal for the Assessee. B.K. Bagchi and B.K. Naha for the Commissioner
UNION CARBIDE INDIA LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax
Law:
Section:
(a) Income-tax----Capital or Revenue expenditure--Machinery imported by assessee-¬Fluctuations in rate of foreign exchange--Excess money paid by assessee because of fluctuations of currency rate was a revenue expenditure. C I T v. Bharat General & Textile Industries Ltd. [19861 157 I T R 158 and Bestobell (India) Ltd. v. C I T [1979] 117 I T R 789. ref. (b) Income-tax-- ---Perquisites--House rent allowance and reimbursement of medical expenses paid by the assessee to its employees is not perquisite. C I T v. Kanan Devan Hills Produce Company Ltd. (1977) 119 I T R 431; Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co. Ltd. v. C I T (1982) 137 I T R 827; C.I.T. v. Alkali and Chemical Corpn of India Ltd. (1986) 158 I T'R 58; and C.I.T. v. General Marketing & Manufacturing Co. (1987) 165 I T R 566 (Cal.) ref. (c) Income-tax-- ---Industry--Deep Sea Fishing Division of assessee-company to be considered as Industrial undertaking. C.I.T. v. Union Carbide India Ltd. (1987) 165 I T R 550 ref. (d) Income-tax--- ---Capital--Assessee, a company--Value of capital work-in-progress in its industrial undertaking, agricultural pesticide division has to be included in the computation of capital employed for the purpose of relief. Indian Oxygen Ltd. (1978) 113 I T R 109 and C.I.T. v. Union Carbide India Ltd. (1987) 165I T R 546 ref. (e) Income-tax-- ---Concession of income-tax to new industrial undertaking--Undertaking worked for a part of the year--Income-tax relief, being available for full year, could not be allowed for a part of the year. C.I.T. v. Oyster Packagers (P.) Ltd. (1985) 152 I T R 471 ref. (f) Income-tax-- ---Weighted deduction--Expenses on account of expert agency inspection fee are entitled to weighted deduction. V. D. Swami & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. C.I.T. (1984) 146 I T R 425; C.I.T. v. Eldee Wire Products Ltd. (1978) 114 I T R 485 (Bom.); C.I.T. v. Jay Engineering Works (1984) 149 ITR 297(Delhi) and Bharat Leneral of Textile Industries Ltd. v. C.I.T. (1985) 153 I T R 747 ref. JUDGMENT DIPAK KUMAR SEN. J.--On an application of the assessee under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions, as questions of law arising out…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492