Case Details

Citation(s)
1989 SLG 53 1989 SLD 53 1989 PTD 347 (1988) 57 TAX 105
Patna High Court
Taxation Cases Nos.142 and 143 of 1976, decision dated: 28-10-1986
UDAY SINGHA AND A1LTWINI KUMAR SINHA, .JJ
B. P. Rajgarhia and S. K. Sharan for the Commissioner. K.N. Jain, G. C. Bharuka and M. Nath for the Assessee

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax

VS

DR. (MRS.) KRISHNA RANA

Law:

Section:

Income-tax----Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has no power to review its own order. JUDGMENT UDAY SINGHA, J.--These are references under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72. The assessee is a doctor in the town of Arrah in this State. She was assessed as an "individual" on income from salary and medical profession. She was assessed on a total income of Rs.15,860 and Rs.58,895 for the two assessment years. The assessee appealed against the orders of assessment for the two years which were disposed of by a common order by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The appeals were dismissed with some modification inasmuch as the total income for the assessment year 1970-71 was reduced by Rs.1,000 and for the subsequent assessment year 1971-72, expenses were mowed at Rs.12,000 instead of Rs.5,800 allowed by the Income Tax Officer. Thus a further relief of Rs.6,200 was allowed to the assessee for the second assessment year. The assessee filed appeals before the Tribunal. On the date fixed for hearing i.e., April 11, 1975, no one appeared on behalf of the assess. The Tribunal heard the departmental representative and disposed of the appeals on merits. Whereas for the assessment year 1970-71 expenses had been allowed to the tune of Rs.2,000, the Tribunal allowed a further deduction of Rs.1,000. The deduction ultimately came to Rs.3,000 as against Rs5,000 claimed by the assessee. In regard to the subsequent assessment year 1971-72 the Tribunal while upholding the estimate of income, further allowed deduction of Rs.6,000 on account of expenses. The deduction thus for that year came to Rs. 18000. Long after the appeals had been disposed of, on May 20, 1975, an application was filed by the assessee before the Tribunal for restoration/rehearing of the appeals. The ground for restoration advanced was that the assessee had not been given reasonable opportunity of pleading her case. The Tribunal, by order dated July 19, 1975, restored the appeals and refixed them for hearing. Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal restoring the appeals for rehearing, the Revenue moved the Tribunal for making a reference to this…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492