| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 3148 2024 SLD 3148 2024 MLD 1086 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 82061 of 2022, decided on 28th April, 2023.Date of hearing: 6th April, 2023.
Present: Asim Hafeez, J
Muhammad Nadeem Iqbal Zahid for Petitioners. Waseem Majeed Malik, Addl, A.G. Sheraz Zaka, Assistant Attorney General. Mudassar Naveed Chattha and Javed Gill for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Hafiz Muhammad Asad Muneer representative of PM&DC/
Respondent No
Writ Petition No. 82061 of 2022, decided on 28th April, 2023.Date of hearing: 6th April, 2023.
Present: Asim Hafeez, J
Muhammad Nadeem Iqbal Zahid for Petitioners. Waseem Majeed Malik, Addl, A.G. Sheraz Zaka, Assistant Attorney General. Mudassar Naveed Chattha and Javed Gill for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Hafiz Muhammad Asad Muneer representative of PM&DC/
Respondent No
Dr. UMMARA MUNIR---Petitioner
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination (NHRSR&C), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and others---Respondents
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Medical qualification---Claim for exemption from requirements of FCPS Part-I---Eligibility---Legitimate expectation, doctrine of---Applicability---Petitioners / doctors claimed to have acquired qualification of MCPS and sought exemption from requirements of FCPS Part-1---Petitioners / doctors claimed eligibility based on certificates of recognition of experience and sought protection against change in exemption rules on the premise of doctrine of legitimate expectation---Validity---Pakistan Medical and Dental Council disowned issuance of equivalence certificates and claim of legitimate expectation failed on merits---No vested right could be claimed to displace the effect of revised exemption rules---Neither doctrine of procedural legitimate expectation nor substantive legitimate expectation was attracted--- No unambiguous assurance / representation was made by CPSP to petitioners / doctors nor any such assurance was pleaded---Legitimacy of expectation was not established and consequently doctrine was not available---High Court declined to invoke judicial review jurisdiction to review legality of decision of CPSP---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Commerce and 2 others v. Salahuddin and 3 others PLD 1991 SC 546; Hashwani Hotels Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1997 SC 315; Mst. Fatima Faryad and others. v. Government of Punjab and others 2020 CLC 836; Dewan Salman Fibre Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others 2015 PTD 2304; R v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213; [2000] 2 WLR 622; Associated Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corp. 1948 1 K.B.223; Prof. Paul Craig in the Textbook, Administrative Law (Sweet & Maxwell) Seventh Edition 2012 at page 688 and R. (Bibi) v. Newham London Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 237 ref. Regina (Patel) v General Medical Council 2013 1 WLR 2801 and 2013 EWCA Civ 327 distinguished. JUDGMENT ASIM HAFEEZ, JUSTICE:---.--- This and connected constitutional petitions, bearing W.P. No. 82054/2022 and W.P. No. 82066/2022 raise common…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492