Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 3164 2024 SLD 3164 2024 CLC 1193
Lahore High Court
"Civil Revision No.925 of 2013, heard on 19th February, 2024.Date of hearing: 19th February, 2024."
Present: Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J
"Raja Muhammad Arif, Additional Advocate General for Petitioners. Sh. Naveed Shahryar, Uneza Siddiqui, Humera Bashir Chaudhary, Safina Safdar Bhatti, Bashir Ahmad Mirza for
Respondents."

"PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Jhang and another----Petitioners

VS

ALLAH BAKHSH and others----Respondents"

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 42,54

(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 42 & 54---Punjab Land Administration Manual, Para. 774---Suit for declaration and injunction---TIRNI GUZAR---Connotation---Non-existing right---Effect---Respondents / plaintiffs were in possession of State land in their capacity of TIRNI GUZAR---Suit was decreed in favour of respondents / plaintiffs concurrently by Trial Court and Lower Appellate Court---Validity---TIRNI GUZAR is merely a lessee / tenant and is not owner of land leased out to him---In revenue record petitioner / Provincial Government was shown owner of suit land and respondents / plaintiffs were mentioned as illegal occupants upon State land---There was neither any mutation nor any order of allotment ever passed in favour of respondents / plaintiffs---Possession of respondents / plaintiffs over suit land was of an illegal nature---All ethical, moral and legal norms favour law abiding persons and lends no support to illegal occupants, usurpers, transgressors, encroachers and grabbers of State land---Through suit for declaration under S. 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 only a declaration is issued regarding a pre-existing right and no fresh right can be created---Any suit for declaration with non-existent right is not maintainable---High Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction set aside judgments and decrees passed by two courts below as they were the result of misreading and non-reading of evidence and failure to apply correct law---Resultantly suit filed by respondents / plaintiff was dismissed---Revision was allowed, in circumstances. Fazal ur Rehman and others v. Province of Punjab through District Officer (Revenue) Bhakkar and another 2014 SCMR 1351; Muhammad Sharif through L.Rs v. Province of Punjab through District Officer Revenue, Pakpattan 2014 SCMR 334; Shazia Gillani and others v. Board of Revenue, Punjab Lahore through Member Colonies and others (in C.P. No.332-L of 2016); Civil Petition No.882-L of 2015; Director Military Lands and Cantonment Quetta Cantt., Quetta and others v. Aziz Ahmed and others 2023 SCMR 860; Al-Shafique Housing Society v. P.M.A PLD 1992 SC 113; Union Council Dhabeji v. Al-Noor Textile Mills Ltd. 1993 SCMR…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492