| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 206 2011 SLD 206 (2011) 103 TAX 377 2011 PTD 1076 2011 LHC 48 2011 PLJ 57 |
Peshawar High Court
Tax Reference No. 12 of 2009, decision dated: 27-01-2011
DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN AND YAHYA AFRIDI, JJ
Isaq Ali Qazi for Appellant AND Mudasir Amir for
Respondent
Tax Reference No. 12 of 2009, decision dated: 27-01-2011
DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN AND YAHYA AFRIDI, JJ
Isaq Ali Qazi for Appellant AND Mudasir Amir for
Respondent
Messrs NATIONAL STEEL MILLS AND REROLLERS (PVT.) LTD., HATTARvsCOLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 45,46,45B
(a) interpretation of statutes-------Amendment in a statute would not affect rights of a person accrued prior thereto---Principles.The rights, privileges, advantages and benefits, which accrue to any person under the provisions of a statute prior to any amendment therein would be protected and not affected in any manner by any provision introduced through it. NS Bindra' Interpretation of Statutes (9th Edition); Adnan Afzal v. Capt: Sher Afzal PLD 1969 SC 187; Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd. v. Irving 1905 AC 369; Khalid Qureshi v. United Bank Ltd. 2001 SCMR 103; Messrs Rais Khan's case 1996 SCMR 83; Pakistan Steel Mill's case 2002 SCMR 1023; Mian Rafiuddin's case PLD 1971 SC 252; Mirza Mehmood Sharif Baig's case PLD 1973 Lah. 114; Barkat Ali's case 1980 CLC 713 and Devachand Muljimal and others' case PLD 1968 Kar 107 rel.(b) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Ss. 45-B & 46 [as amended by Finance Act (VII of 2005) w.e.f. 1-7-2007]---Amendments in Ss. 45-B & 46 of Sales Tax, Act, 1990 made through Finance Act, 2005 after passing of order-in-original by Collector---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal by revenue---Scope---Such amendments were prospective in nature---Right of appeal accrued to revenue prior to such amendments would remain intact and unaffected---Principles. NS Bindra' Interpretation of Statutes (9th Edition); Adrian Afzal v. Capt: Sher Afzal PLD 1969 SC 187; Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd. v. Irving 1905 AC 369; Khalid Qureshi v. United Bank Ltd. 2001 SCMR 103; Messrs Rais Khan's case 1996 SCMR 83; Pakistan Steel Mill's case 2002 SCMR 1023; Mian Rafiuddin's case PLD1971 SC 252; Mirza Mehmood Sharif Baig's case PLD 1973 Lah. 114; Barkat Ali's case 1980 CLC 713 and Devachand Muljimal and others case PLD 1968 Kar 107 rel.(c) Administration of justice-------Act of the court shall prejudice no person (actus curiae neminem gravabit). Mst. Baz Khana's case PLD 2005 Pesh. 214; Mst. Razia Jafar's case 2007 SCMR 1256 and Akbar Shah's case 2010 SCMR 1408 rel.(d) Appeal (Civil)-------Appeal is continuation of original proceedings.JUDGMENT YAHYA AFRIDI, J.---Messrs National Steel Mills and Re-rollers (Pvt.) Ltd. has instituted the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492