| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 1089 2012 SLD 1089 2012 PLD 189 |
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Revision No.73 of 2012, decision dated: 8-06-2012, hearing DATE : 4-06-2012
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, J
Kamran Murtaza, Amanullah Batezai and Rizwan Ejaz for Petitioners. Muhammad Hassan Mutawakil for the Complainant. Abdul Karim Malghani for the State.
Criminal Revision No.73 of 2012, decision dated: 8-06-2012, hearing DATE : 4-06-2012
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, J
Kamran Murtaza, Amanullah Batezai and Rizwan Ejaz for Petitioners. Muhammad Hassan Mutawakil for the Complainant. Abdul Karim Malghani for the State.
ABDUL QAHIR alias SADIQ and 3 others
VS
BIBI AISHA and 2 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)---Ss. 2(c), 2(d), 3, 4 & 7---"Lawful possession"---Proof---Scope---"Owner"---Proof---Scope--- Property was recorded in the name of the deceased-husband of the complainant---Whether complaint under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, was maintainable under such circumstances---Watchman residing in the property on behalf of the complainant---Whether such possession of watchman qualified as possession by the complainant---Lodging of F.I.R. not a bar to availing remedy under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 and vice versa---Trial Court had allowed the application of the complainant under S.7 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005--- Contentions of the accused persons (petitioners) were that documents referred to and relied upon by the complainant were fake and fabricated; that the complainant was neither occupier nor recorded owner of the property in question, and the complainant not being in possession of the property had no legal status to maintain the direct complaint under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005---Validity---For the purpose of proving lawful possession, it was incumbent upon the person claiming such possession to produce certain documents or evidence to prove his possession as lawful possession over the property---Complainant had produced ownership documents of the property, while the accused persons did not produce any evidence or documents to show that they were either lawful owners or occupiers of the property---Although complainant was not the recorded owner of the property, which stood recorded in the name of her deceased-husband but a Muslim's estate vested immediately in his or her heirs after his/her death and the devolution of property took place immediately through inheritance without any intervention---Although complainant was not in actual and physical possession of the property at the time of the alleged dispossession but her watchmen was residing therein along with his family members, who were forcibly dispossessed by the accused persons---Possession of the complainant could not be denied in such circumstances---Complainant being the owner and occupier of the property had the legal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492