| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 1669 2011 SLD 1669 2011 PLC 400 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No.165(K)(C.S.) of 2000, decision dated: 25-02-2010.
SALIM GUL SHAIKH AND SAYED MEHAR HUSSAIN SHAH, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No.165(K)(C.S.) of 2000, decision dated: 25-02-2010.
SALIM GUL SHAIKH AND SAYED MEHAR HUSSAIN SHAH, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
KHURSHEED AHMED
VS
GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others KHURSHEED AHMED vs GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others
Law:
Section:
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)-------S. 4---Representation for grant of Basic Pay Scale and increments---Appellant, in view of of the Service Tribunal passed in favour of co-employee whereby he was granted BPS-15, filed a representation for grant of BPS-15 from the date when co-employee was granted such Pay Scale and three advance increments for obtaining Master's degree---Said representation having been rejected, appellant had filed appeal before Service Tribunal---Judgment passed by Service Tribunal in favour of co-employee was upheld upto Supreme Court---Supreme Court in case reported in 1996 SCMR 1185 had observed that, if Service Tribunal or Supreme Court would decide a point of law relating to the terms and conditions of a civil servant, which covers not only the cases of civil servants who litigated, but also of other civil servants who could have not taken any legal proceedings in' such a case, the dictates and rule of good governance demanded that the benefit of such of Service Tribunal/Supreme Court be extended to other civil servants who could not become parties to the litigation---Impugned appellate order was set aside with direction that appellant be allowed BPS-15 accordingly with back-benefits and that appellant be accorded three increments as prayed for by the appellant with arrears upto date for obtaining Master's degree. 1995 SCMR 776; 1997 PLC (C.S.) 579; 1996 SCMR 856; 1999 PLC (C.S.) 1; 1995 SCMR 950; 1999 PLC (C.S.) 1458; 1998 SCMR 2652=1999 PLC (C.S.) 1; 1993 PLC (C.S.) 123; 1995 PLC (C.S.) 803; 1995 SCMR 16; 1998 PLC (C.S.) 653; 1986 PLC (C.S:) 745 and 1997 PLC (C.S.) 165 ref. Sanaullah Noor Ghouri for Appellant. Ch. M. Latif Saghar for Respondents. Date of hearing: 12th December, 2009. JUDGMENT SAYED MEHAR HUSSAIN SHAH (MEMBER).--- The appellant, in view of the judgment of this Tribunal dated 21-4-1999 in Appeal No.780(L) of 1997 M. Zubair Rana v. Secretary Railways Board, Ministry of Railways and others, has filed a representation dated 12-6-2000 for grant of BPS-15 w.e.f. 1-7-1983 and three advance increments for possessing M.A. w.e.f. 25-3-1988, which representation was rejected vide letter dated 8-7-2000, conveyed to him on…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492