| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 2279 2013 SLD 2279 2013 PLD 675 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petitions Nos. 28685 and 29224 of 2012, decided on 29thNovember, 2012
SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, J
Ch. Ahmed Uzair for Petitioner (in W.P. No. 28685 of 2012) and Dr. Khald Ranjha for Petitioner (In W.P.No. 29224 of 2012). Syed Abdul Hayee Gillani, Additional Attorney General for Pakistan. Ch. Muhammad Hussain, Dy. Attorney General for Pakistan. Shan Gu
Writ Petitions Nos. 28685 and 29224 of 2012, decided on 29thNovember, 2012
SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, J
Ch. Ahmed Uzair for Petitioner (in W.P. No. 28685 of 2012) and Dr. Khald Ranjha for Petitioner (In W.P.No. 29224 of 2012). Syed Abdul Hayee Gillani, Additional Attorney General for Pakistan. Ch. Muhammad Hussain, Dy. Attorney General for Pakistan. Shan Gu
Rao NAEEM SARFARAZVsELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 225,224,199,224(4),224(1),224(2),254,Pre amble
Law: Representation of the People Act, 1976
Section: 108,11,11A,52,Preamble
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 225, 224 & 199---Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Ss. 108, 11, 11-A & 52---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Bye-elections, alteration in Schedule---Bar of Art.225 of the Constitution on adjudication of election disputes by High Court---Scope---Constitutional petition impugning notification issued by Election Commission for alteration in bye-election schedule under S.11-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1976---Maintainability---Alternate remedy---Contention of the respondents that the only remedy available to the petitioner was to file an election petition under S.52 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 and that jurisdiction of High Court was barred under Art.225 of the Constitution---Held, that interference could be made by the High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution if the order under challenge was without lawful authority, coram non judice, and was based on mala fide---Constitutional petition was maintainable. Federation of Pakistan and others v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and others PLD 2009 SC 644; Lt.-Gen. (R) Salahuddin Tirmizi v. Election Commission of Pakistan 2008 SCMR 735; Ayatullah Dr. Imran Liaquat Hussain v. Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad and another PLD 2005 SC 52; Aftab Shahban Mirani v. President of Pakistan and others 1998 SCMR 1863; Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi v. Additional District and Sessions Judge/Returning Officer, N.A. 158, Naushero Feroze and others 1994 SCMR 1299 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 224(4), 224(1), 224(2) & 199---Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Ss. 42 & 108---Bye-elections---Constitutional time frame---Declaration of results---Interpretation of Art.224(4) of the Constitution---Term "election", connotation---Question before the High Court was whether there should be clear 120 days between the polling date for bye-elections and the date of expiry of Assemblies; or did the period of 120 days as stipulated under Art.224(4) began from the time of occurrence of the vacancy of the seat for which bye-election was to be held---Held, that Art.224(4) of the Constitution clearly stated thatβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492