Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 1389 2011 SLD 1389 2011 PLD 512
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1577-L of 2010, decide don 24th February, 2011. (Against the order dated 30-6-2010 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in W. P. No.2395 of 2009).
MIAN SAQIB NISAR AND ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

KHALILUR-REHMAN and anothers

VS

Dr. MANZOOR AHMED and others

Law:

Section:

Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance (XXI of 2007)--- ----S. 22---Object, scope and nature of S. 22 of the Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance, 2007--Non filing of affidavits of witnesses along with the application for leave to defend---Effect---Held, option has been given to the tenant that for the purposes of making out a case for the leave, if he feels the necessity of the affidavits of the witnesses in support of his defence, he may file those, but a restriction has been placed that such affidavits should not be more than two---If the option however, is not exercised by the tenant there are no penal consequences provided in law that shall be precluded to examine any witness in the course of trial in order to prove his case---Provision is directory and of a benign procedural nature---Once the leave to defend has been granted to a tenant, despite the non filing of the affidavit of the witness by him, his right to prove the case through oral evidence remains unimpaired. M. Aslam Riaz, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. ORDER MIAN SAQIB NISAR. J.---The petitioners initiated an ejectment petition against the respondents under the provisions of Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance). The latter in terms of section 22(3) of the Ordinance filed an application for leave to defend the petition, which was allowed, whereafter upon framing of the issues the parties were put to trial and the petition was dismissed by learned Rent Tribunal through the order dated 12-9-2009, holding that no grounds justifying the eviction of the respondents has been proved by the petitioners. The order was unsuccessfully assailed by the petitioners in appeal, and their further challenge to these orders remained fruitless before the Lahore High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that in violation of section 22(3) ibid the affidavits of witnesses were not filed along with the application for leave to defend, therefore, besides the effect thereof, that the respondents were not entitled to the leave, they were also precluded to examine any witness whose affidavit was not so…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492