| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 347 2012 SLD 347 2012 PLD 264 |
Lahore High Court
F.A.O. No.118 of 2009, heard on 25-10-2010
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J
Imran Aziz Khan for Appellant. Ch. Fasih-uz-Zam along with
Respondent. Nemo
F.A.O. No.118 of 2009, heard on 25-10-2010
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J
Imran Aziz Khan for Appellant. Ch. Fasih-uz-Zam along with
Respondent. Nemo
CHAIRMAN INDUS MOTORS CO.
VS
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD and others
Law: Punjab Consumer Protection Act, (II of 2005)
Section: 6,8,31(b),31
(a) Punjab Consumer Protection Act (II of 2005)--- ----Ss.6, 8 & 31(b)---Consumer protection---Replacement of product---Change of gearbox of car---Consumer purchased brand new car and due to some manufacturing defect its gearbox leaked and the same was replaced by the manufacturer---Trial Court decreed the case in favour of consumer and directed manufacturer to replace defective car with brand new one---Plea raised by manufacturer was that such relief conferred unjust enrichment upon consumer because of increased value of new model and diminished value of purchased vehicle due to its continuous use by consumer as it did not have the same impact and was liable to be treated differently---Validity---Original manufacturer's seal of gearbox was broken and replaced locally---New gearbox supplied in sealed condition by manufacturer was not fitted in the vehicle---Unsealing of gearbox was as serious as unsealing of engine of a new vehicle---Trial Court was correct to hold that consumer was supplied a defective car by manufacturer and that its repair by dealership diminished its value so as to deprive the consumer of brand new car that he had purchased---Consumer demanded replacement of vehicle at the time of detection of defect and took delivery of repaired vehicle after signing customer's satisfaction report under protest---Manufacturer was liable for defective construction of gearbox housing and for breach of warranty by consequent repair that the engine installation and gearbox assembly remained in original condition---Manufacturer's liability had arisen under the provisions of Ss.6 and 8 of Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005---High Court directed the consumer to return his purchased vehicle to manufacturer who would forthwith refund the full price thereof received from consumer---High Court further directed that in case consumer did not return the vehicle to manufacturer he would lose his right of receiving accrued profit on the price paid, resultantly passed by Trial Court was modified---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. Eastern Automobiles Limited v. Tasadaq Hussain PLD 1959 Lah. 681 rel. (b) Punjab Consumer Protection Act (II of 2005)--- ----S.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492