Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 1395 2011 SLD 1395 2011 PLD 927
Supreme Court of Pakistan
SUO MOTU CASE NO. 18 OF 2010: In the matter of (Violation ofPublic Procurement Rules, 2004) (Suo Motu Action regardingviolation of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurementloss of billions of rupees of exchequer caused by NationalInsurance Company
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C, J., TARIQ PARVEZ AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ

(Violation of Public Procurement Rules, 2004)(Suo Motu Action regarding violation of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer caused by National Insurance Company Ltd.).

Law:

Section:

(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 184(3)---Judicial review of administrative action---Scope---Civil service---Investigation of a financial scam by civil servant, who had obeyed the Supreme Court, order and stood for the role of law despite threats etc., advanced to hive by the political figures and had shown his commitment to discharge his duties strictly in accordance with law had been suspended for no other reasons except to make the order of Supreme Court ineffective whereby the Investigation Agency was directed to cooperate with investigation team headed by the said civil servant but' instead the team members were transferred---Competent authority has been vested with the discretion to pass administrative order but such discretion has to be exercised in accordance with law---In the present case, there were certain allegations against the civil servant (who was heading the /investigation team) and a show-cause notice was issued which was replied by him, on the basis of material, without considering the reply filed by civil servant, the person who called for his explanation was not empowered for the same under Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 being in grade 21--Admittedly such notice for explanation of the civil servant was not issued under R.6, Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 for misconduct rather the same was issued to get his response about the allegations---Record showed that the order of suspension of said civil servant was issued by the person who was not competent as the verbal orders were obtained from the competent authority, later on, confirmed by the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister (competent authority)---No incriminating material, admittedly was produced except a letter and even without considering the fact that whether reply was given or not---Held, Supreme Court, ordinarily does not intervene in the functioning of the Executive, but the court has been empowered, while exercising the powers of judicial/review, to examine the administrative orders as well---Principles. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ---Art. 184 & 199---Judicial review of discretion and exercise of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492