| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 2678 2013 SLD 2678 2013 YLR 1587 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 13981-B, 14662-B and 15028-B of 2012, decided on 24th October, 2012
SYED MUHAMMAD KAZIM RAZA SHAMSI, J
Azam Nazeer Tarar and Mian Jameel Akhtar for Petitioner. Sikandar Javed for the Complainant. Nisar Ahmad Gondal, Addl. P.G. with Ahmad Munir, S.I
Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 13981-B, 14662-B and 15028-B of 2012, decided on 24th October, 2012
SYED MUHAMMAD KAZIM RAZA SHAMSI, J
Azam Nazeer Tarar and Mian Jameel Akhtar for Petitioner. Sikandar Javed for the Complainant. Nisar Ahmad Gondal, Addl. P.G. with Ahmad Munir, S.I
YAS NAVEED
VS
The STATE and another
Law:
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 161, 497(2) & 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/148/149/364---Qatl-e-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, kidnapping or abducting in order to murder---Bail, grant of---Implication of accused on basis of supplementary statement---Scope---Accused and co-accused persons allegedly kidnapped the deceased and killed him---F.I.R. attributed role of lalkara upon accused and co-accused persons whereas in the supplementary statement of complainant, they were assigned a specific role of causing fatal injuries to the deceased---Accused and co-accused persons were mentioned in the F.I.R. as unknown persons with no description provided therein--- Complainant subsequently implicated accused and co-accused persons through his statement before the police by stating that he and prosecution witnesses had verified that it was the accused and co-accused persons, who had murdered the deceased---Statement introduced subsequently by the complainant did not disclose the place where the complainant and prosecution witnesses confronted the accused and co-accused persons and as to how they were able to identify them---Subsequent statement of complainant was merely a statement made under S. 161, Cr.P.C., which had no value in eyes of law and could not be equated with the first version made in the crime report---Supplementary statement was made by complainant after six days of the occurrence, therefore, there was every likelihood that nomination of accused and co-accused persons could have been a result of due deliberation and consultation---Case was of two versions, one given in the F.I.R. and the other made in the supplementary statement, therefore implication of accused and co-accused persons required further inquiry---Interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed in circumstances, while co-accused persons were ordered to be released on bail. 2003 SCMR 1419 and 2008 SCMR 1556 rel. ORDER SYED MUHAMMAD KAZIM RAZA SHAMSI, J.---Criminal Miscel-laneous No.13981-B of 2012, Criminal Miscellaneous 14662-B of 2012 and Criminal Miscellaneous No.15028-B of 2012 are being disposed of by this single order as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492