| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 2325 2013 SLD 2325 2013 PLD 488 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. D-3772 and Misc. No. 40570 of 2012, decided on 8th March, 2013
SAJJAD ALI SHAH AND NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO, JJ
Mohsin Shahwani for Petitioners. Nazir Tanoli and Abdul Latrif Shaikh for
Respondent No. 4. Sher Muhammad K. Shaikh, A.A.G. Ali Haider Saleem, A.P.G. ASI Munir Ahmed and ASI Shahzad of P.S.Mithdar
Constitutional Petition No. D-3772 and Misc. No. 40570 of 2012, decided on 8th March, 2013
SAJJAD ALI SHAH AND NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO, JJ
Mohsin Shahwani for Petitioners. Nazir Tanoli and Abdul Latrif Shaikh for
Respondent No. 4. Sher Muhammad K. Shaikh, A.A.G. Ali Haider Saleem, A.P.G. ASI Munir Ahmed and ASI Shahzad of P.S.Mithdar
Shaikh MUHAMMAD AAMIR and anothers
VS
GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 4 others
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 489F
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 561A,154
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 489-F---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 561-A & 154---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Constitutional petition---Quashing of proceedings---"Dishonest issuance" of a cheque---Scope---Undated cheque issued with the mutual agreement that it would not be presented to any bank without written consent of drawer (i.e. issuer of cheque)---Effect---Accused had issued ten undated cheques to complainant-company, and each cheque contained an endorsement on its back stating that it was mutually agreed that the company would not present it to any bank without written consent of accused---Complainant-company, without written consent of accused, presented two of the cheques before a bank and got them dishonoured---F.I.R. under S.489-F, P.P.C was lodged against accused---Plea of accused that cheques were issued with a clear understanding that they would not be presented unless consent in writing was obtained from him, therefore, neither there was any dishonesty on his part nor ingredients of S.489-F, P.P.C were attracted, thus, F.I.R. was a result of mala fide of complainant-company---Validity---Undated cheques were admittedly issued by accused on different dates with the condition that they should not be presented without his written consent, which condition was accepted by complainant-company without any objection, therefore, presentation of cheques without obtaining written consent of accused was totally unauthorized and would not bring such presentation within the mischief of "dishonest issuance" as the cheques were not issued by accused for payment---No successful prosecution of accused was possible even if the allegations in the F.I.R. were not rebutted, therefore, present criminal proceedings were nothing but an abuse of process of the court---Proceeding emanating from F.I.R. under S.489-F, P.P.C were quashed in circumstances---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.489-F---Offence of dishonestly issuing a cheque---Pre-requisites---Basic ingredients of S.489-F, P.P.C were the "dishonest issuance of a cheque" towards repayment of a loan or…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492