Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 302(b),324,337-F(i),337-F(ii),34

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 239

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b)/324/337-F(i)/337-F(ii)/34---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.239---Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e-amd and causing Damiyah and Badiyah---Appreciation of evidence---Charges against accused were framed under separate three heads; i.e. causing murder; attempting to commit qatl-e-amd and causing injuries (Damiyah and Badiyah)---All accused persons had allegedly committed more than one offences in the same transaction---Said accused persons could be tried and charged together and case of framing charge against accused would be covered under S.239, Cr.P.C.---Charge, in circumstances, had correctly been framed by the Trial Court against accused persons---Ocular evidence coincided with other circumstances of the case and was free from any contradiction and discrepancies---Evidence was straightforward, true and confidence-inspiring---Witness was subjected to lengthy cross-examination, but he remained stuck to his stand---Nothing adverse had been brought out by the defence to prove him hostitle or having any ill-will to falsely implicate accused persons---Evidence of said witness could be safely relied upon---No contradiction was found between ocular evidence and medical evidence---Abandoning of two witnesses and not producing the other three injured witnesses would not affect the case of prosecution, because evidence of complainant who appeared as eye-witness, was sufficient to prove guilt of accused persons---Recovery of fifteen empties had been proved through witness as well as Investigating Officer---Same numbers of injuries were found on the dead bodies of two deceased---Recovery of empties and Kalashinkov and its examination by Forensic Science Laboratory were supporting the prosecution case---Weapon of offence, in circumstances had also been proved to have been used in the commission of offence by accused---Accused were aggressors, while the complainant party in the case was aggressed upon existence of cross case, would not help accused persons---Motive given by the complainant party was proved through evidence of the complainant---Prosecution had succeeded to prove case against accused persons on the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492