Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 1110 2011 SLD 1110 2011 PTD 1052
Lahore High Court
Income Tax Appeal Nos.19 to 24 of 1999 and 233 to 236 of 2002, decision dated: 23rd December, 2010, hearing DATE : 12-10-2010
IJAZ-UL-AHSAN AND MUHAMMAD FARRUKH IRFAN KHAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

KHALID MUHAMMAD KHAN

VS

INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and 2 others

Law: Wealth Tax Act, (XV of 1963)

Section: 2(5),3,4,27

Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963)--- ----Ss.2 (5), 3, 4 & 27---Assets---Reference to High Court---Purchase of agricultural land---Exemption in tax---Transfer against agreement to sell---Grievance of assessee was that he purchased agricultural land against agreement to sell which was for sale on profit and whole consideration amount was paid by him to sellers--Validity---According to agreement to sell in question, assessee had paid entire sale consideration and sellers had delivered possession of the property to assessee---Sellers had also executed general power of attorney in favour of assessee which was duly registered with concerned Sub-Registrar--On the basis of such documents, assessee transferred his agricultural land in question in favour of his minor son, which fact was neither denied nor disputed---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in rejecting claim of ownership of agricultural land by assessee and treating the amount paid as advance payment for purchase of that land---In case it was found that property in question was in possession of the assessee, who had paid entire sale consideration and was in possession of a validly executed agreement of sale backed by a general power of attorney, the same would constitute a part of assessee's assets---Contention of authorities was that property in question was acquired for further sale on payment of management fee, which contention was neither substantiated nor supported by record---Position taken by assessee was not only supported by documentary evidence but also by relevant provisions of law and s of various Courts---Reference was decided in negative in circumstances. M. Ghulam Muhammad v. Custodian of Evacuee Property, Lahore and others PLD 1966 (W.P.) Lah. 953; Holomal v. Ghulam Ali PLD 1997 Kar. 509; Mst. Rasheeda Begum and others v. Muhammad Yousaf and others 2002 SCMR 1089; Dost Muhammad and others v. Ghaus Muhammad through Legal Heirs and others 2004 SCMR 515; Muhammad Bashir v. Abdul Haruki 1991 CLC Note 53; Ch.Hakim Ali v. Sultan Khan and 3 others 2001 MLD 563; Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. S.M.T. Satyabihama Ganeriwala ITR 196 at page 401 and Madgul Udyog v. Commissioner of Income Tax ITR…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492