Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 2054 2011 SLD 2054 2011 SCMR 563
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 299 of 2007, decision dated: 8-10-2009
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, NASIR-UL-MULK AND CH. IJAZ AHMED, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SABIR ALI alias FAUJI

VS

. THE STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------S. 302(b)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Leave to appeal was granted to accused by Supreme Court to reappraise the entire evidence for safe administration of justice. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Appraisal of evidence---Complainant had neither named the accused nor given his descriptive features in the F.I.R.---Evidence of identification parade was of no value due to the inherent defect that the witnesses had not described the role of accused in the occurrence while identifying him---Witnesses according to F.I.R. did not know the accused prior to the occurrence and the identification parade was not held according to law, therefore identification of accused in court by the witnesses was also of no value---Witnesses of identification had various opportunities to see the accused prior to the holding of identification parade? which even otherwise having been held six months after the occurrence and nine days after the arrest of accused, had created many doubts about his identity---Confessional statement allegedly made by accused before the Investigating Officer was not believable in the absence of any corroborating evidence and no inference in this regard could be drawn against the accused when this circumstance was not put to him in his statement recorded under S.342, Cr.P.C.---Recovery of rifle from the accused in violation of S.103, Cr.P.C. was, doubtful---Witnesses had made improvements in their statements before the Trial Court---Ocular testimony was inconsistent and the same did not inspire confidence---Accused was acquitted in circumstances. Muhammad Hussain's case 1993 SCMR 1614; Munir Ahmed's case 1998 SCMR 752; Pasand's case PLD 1981 SC 142; Farman Hussain's case PLD 1995 SC 1; Ismail's case 1974 SCMR 175; Farman Ali's case 1997 SCMR 971; Ghulam Rasul's case 1988 SCMR 557; Mahmood Ahtned's case 1995 SCMR 127; Khadim Hussain's case 1985 SCMR 721; Sohn's case PLD 1974 Cr. Cases 208; Maula Dad's case AIR 1925 Lah. 426; Sultan's case PLD 1976 B.J. 10 and G.M. Sikdar's case PLD 1970 SC 158 ref. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)-Identification parade---Evidentiary value---Failure on…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492