Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 2090 2011 SLD 2090 2011 YLR 359
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeals Nos. 792 of 2009 331 and M.R. No. 336 of 2005, heard on 22nd September, 2010
SH. NAJAM UL HASAN AND MUHAMMAD ANWAARUL HAQ, JJ
Malik Saeed Hassan with Dr. Khalid Ranjha for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 792 of 2009). Nazir Ahmad Ghazi for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 331 of 2005) for the Complainant (in Criminal Appeal No. 792 of 2009). Qazi Zafar Iqbal, Additional Prose

SHAHID alias KAKA CHAND

VS

THE STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.302(b)---Qatl-e-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Specific plea of sudden provocation and self defence taken by accused was not proved by him, as required under Article 121 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, and he even did not appear as his own witness to disprove the allegation levelled against him under S.340(2), Cr. P. C. ---Accused was specifically nominated in the promptly lodged F.I.R. with a specific role---Ocular testimony was consistent, straight forward and had no material discrepancy or contradiction---Eye witnesses had no personal grudge or ill will for false implication of accused in the case and they had reasonably explained their presence at the scene of occurrence---Prosecution evidence was worth reliance and was corroborated by medical evidence---Recovery of "Chhuri" along with positive reports of Chemical Examiner and Serologist had further supported the prosecution version---Conviction of accused was maintained in circumstance-F.I.R. itself contained a valid ground for mitigation in favour of accused, as he had acted on the instigation of his mother at the time of occurrence---Accused was 23/24 years of age and his action under the influence of his co-accused parents could not be ruled out in the peculiar circumstances of the case---Death sentence of accused was altered to imprisonment for life in circumstances. Noor Muhammad v. The State 1988 SCMR 1640; Tariq and 2 others v. The State 1995 SCMR 168; Mst. Hafeezan Bibi v. Muhammad Tufail and others 1995 SCMR 256 and Nazeer Ahmad v. The State 1999 SCMR 396 ref. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.302(b)---Qanune-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 121---Qatl-e-amd---Defence plea---Burden of proof---When an accused takes a special plea in his defence, he has !to prove the same under Article 121 of Qanune-e-Shahadat, 1984, but the basic burden to prove. its case beyond any shadow of doubt still remains on the prosecution. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-e-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence reduction in---Mitigating circumstances---"Lalkara" of the father or the mother can be treated as a mitigating circumstance…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492