Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 2056 2011 SLD 2056 2011 SCMR 577
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Constitution Petition No. 646 of 2009, decision dated: 8-05-2009 (On appeal from the judgment dated 25-2-2009 of the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad passed in W.P. No. 798 of 2008)
JAVED IQBAL, SAYED ZAHID HUSSAIN AND MUHAMMAD SAIR ALI, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD.

VS

. HAKEEM KHAN

Law:

Section:

Zarai Taraqiati Bank's Staff Service Regulations, 2005-------Regln.7(b)---Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance (LX of 2002), S. 6---Removal. from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Ss.1 (4), 2(c), 3, 5, 9 & 10---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.185(3)---Order of relieving from service---Inefficiency and absence from duty, charges of--Imposition of such penalty by competent authority in terms of Regln.7(b) of Zarai Taraqiati Bank's Staff Service Regulations, 2005 without resorting to provisions of Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000---Validity---Practical effect of word "relieved" from service as used in impugned order was deprivation of petitioner from source of his livelihood---Respondent-Bank was a corporate body owned, managed and controlled by Federal Government for purposes of Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 even after enforcement of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002---Provisions of said Ordinance, 2000 were applicable to Bank as per its own Circular dated 31-1-2008 having revised thereby delegation of powers to its various officers under Ordinance, 2000---Competent authority had special powers under Ordinance, 2000 to proceed against petitioner being in Corporation Service---Petitioner under Ss.3 and 5 of Ordinance, 2000 was entitled to defend himself and explain his position in inquiry; and upon any action taken against him under Ordinance, 2000 had right to avail remedy of representation and file appeal before Service Tribunal---Competent authority by not adhering to provisions of Ordinance, 2000 had deprived petitioner of safeguards and remedies available to him under law---Adoption of course of passing a relieving order appeared to be a ruse to circumvent inquiry proceedings provided for by Ordinance, 2000---Court could not countenance such a colourable exercise of power---Supreme Court declared impugned order to be without lawful authority and ordered for reinstatement of petitioner into service leaving open for Bank for proceeding against him under Ordinance, 2000. Azizullah Memon v.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492