| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1976 SLG 275 1976 SLD 275 1976 SCMR 317 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for appeal Leave to Appeal No. 99-R of 1975, decision dated: 11th December 1975
ANWARUL HAQ AND MUHAMMAD HALEEM, JJ
Samad Mahmood, Advocate and Moor Ahmad Noori. Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
Civil Petition for appeal Leave to Appeal No. 99-R of 1975, decision dated: 11th December 1975
ANWARUL HAQ AND MUHAMMAD HALEEM, JJ
Samad Mahmood, Advocate and Moor Ahmad Noori. Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
Mst. MUMTAZ BEGUM AND ANOTHERS
VS
ABDUL AZIZ AND OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Settlement scheme No. I- --- Par&. 4(G)-Transfer to locals---No material supporting contention of house being valued at Rs. 10,00) or less-Transfer documents having price evaluated at Rs. 12,t-OC--Mere submission contained in petition regarding valuation of house being Rs. 10,000 or less No evidence--Petitioner, a local, held, not entitled to transfer of house under Scheme No. 1. (b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)--- ---- S. 20 read with Limitation Act (1X of 1908), S. 5-Limitation-Condonation of delay--House disposed of under ear-marking Scheme and transferee apprising tenant of such transfer by statutory notice under S. 30, Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958-Service of such notice followed by prolonged proceedings for ejectment of tenant culminating in order of Supreme Court and written undertaking of tenant to vacate premises within 3 months-No mention ever made by tenant of pendency of his L. H. form during all these years Tenant's later application before Settlement authority for transfer of house to him on basis of his L. H. form-A dishonest move Settlement authority's order in revision condoning delay in filing application-Arbitrary and capricious- Quad-judicial authorities also required to exercise discretion in judicial and rational manner, living reasons for their decision-No explanation for condoning 'clay forthcoming on record---High court's order setting aside Settlement authority's order, held, eminently just and proper. ORDER ANWARUL HAQ, J.-The dispute in this case concerns house No. 156, situate in Model Town, A-Block, Lyallpur- It was occupied by Sh. Abdur Rauf, the predecessor-in-interest of the two petitioners before us. It was transferred under the car-marking Scheme to respondents Abdul Aziz and Muhammad Sharif on 13-12-59. In due course, transfer document were issued in their favour. It is admitted that hereafter the respondents served upon Sh. Abdur Rauf a notice under section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation; Act. 1973, limitation the fact of transfer of the house in their favour and calling upon him to pay rent, In 1963, they…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492