| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 6685 2011 SLD 6685 2011 PCRLJ 1687 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2570/M of 2010, heard on 24th May, 2011.Date of hearing: 24th May, 2011.
Before Abdul Waheed Khan, J
Rana Shahbaz Ali Khan for Petitioner. Nisar Ahmad Virk, D.P.-G. for
Respondents.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2570/M of 2010, heard on 24th May, 2011.Date of hearing: 24th May, 2011.
Before Abdul Waheed Khan, J
Rana Shahbaz Ali Khan for Petitioner. Nisar Ahmad Virk, D.P.-G. for
Respondents.
ADIL alias ADLA---Petitioner
VS
THE STATE and another---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 397,561-A
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 393,392,411
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 397 & 561-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.393, 392 & 411---Attempt to commit robbery, robbery, dishonestly receiving stolen property---Direction sought for sentences to run concurrently---Accused convicted in three different cases by two different courts had sought concurrent running of his sentences---Sentences awarded to accused had attained finality---No such concession had been granted to accused during the hearing of his appeals or revision by High Court---High Court had the discretion to direct the running of the subsequent sentences concurrently with the earlier sentence, but the same could not be exercised mechanically as a matter of routine---Such concession being only an exception could not be applied as a rule---Discretion could be exercised by the court on having found that all the offences had been committed in the course of realization of common object, which the accused wanted to achieve at a particular point of time---Offence committed by the present accused of one F.I.R. was not interconnected with the offences committed of two other F.I.Rs. registered at different Police Stations---All the offences had been committed with distinguishable and separate criminal objectives sought to be achieved at three different places and points of time---Accused' convicted in different cases was not entitled for the running of his sentences concurrently, when the occurrences were not the result of series of acts towards the commission of offence, the same were not interconnected and the dates, time and places of occurrence were entirely different---Application was dismissed in circumstances. JUDGMENT ABDUL WAHEED KHAN, JUSTICE:---.--- The petitioner, who was convicted in three different cases, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. seeking concurrent running of the sentences awarded to him from two different courts. 2. The petitioner was convicted from the Court of Mr. Liaqat Ali Ranjha, Magistrate Section-30, Sialkot on 26-6-2008 in case F.I.R. No.176 of 2006 dated 22-6-2006 under section 393, P.P.C. registered at Police Station, Neikapura, Sialkot City to suffer sentence…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492