| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 1018 2011 SLD 1018 2011 YLR 1151 |
Lahore High Court
S.A.O. No. 88 of 2010, decision Dated: 28-09-2010.
CH. MUHAMMAD TAIRQ, JUSTICE
Noman Qureshi for Appellant. Mian Muhammad Yousaf Saqi for
Respondent No.1.
S.A.O. No. 88 of 2010, decision Dated: 28-09-2010.
CH. MUHAMMAD TAIRQ, JUSTICE
Noman Qureshi for Appellant. Mian Muhammad Yousaf Saqi for
Respondent No.1.
MAQSOOD AHMAD
VS
SH. MUHAMMAD IKRAM ULLAH
Law: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)
Section: 13
West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)--- ----S. 13---Ejectment petition on ground of default and bona fide personal need of landlord for his family-Rent Controller allowed ejectment petition and Appellate Court dismissed tenant's appeal---Tenant contended that courts below had decided the case on sole statement of the landlord---Validity---Landlord needed the rented shop for his' young educated sons who were jobless---Tenant had failed to establish that landlord was owner of any other commercial property---Tenant had also failed to pay the monthly rent to landlord at the enhanced rate which was rightly found by the courts to be wilful defaulter--Unshaken sole statement of landlord was sufficient to prove his contentions---Tenant having failed to point out any illegality, misreading or non--reading of evidence in impugned s/orders, appeal was dismissed. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: CH. MUHAMMAD TARIQ, JUSTICE:---.--- This Second Appeal against the Order has been directed against the judgment dated 8-3-2010 passed by learned District Judge, Sargodha; who dismissed the appeal and maintained the order of learned Rent Controller, Sargodha. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that respondent filed an eviction petition under section 13 of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, against the appellant for the ejectment of appellant from suit shop fully described in Para No.1 of the appeal. 3. That the appellant/respondent contested the eviction petition by filing written reply. 4. That the Rent Controller, Sargodha, after framing of issues and recording of oral as well as documentary evidence of the parties, accepted the eviction petition on the ground of bona fide personal need and that the appellant is a willful defaulter vide order dated 23-11-2006. 5. That the appellant tiled an appeal before the learned District Judge, Sargodha, who accepted the appeal and vide judgment dated 14-9-2007 remanded the case back to the learned Rent Controller for deciding it afresh after affording opportunity to the parties. 6. That in pursuance of direction of learned District Judge, Sargodha, vide order dated 14-9-2007 the learned Rent Controller…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492