Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 2146 2011 SLD 2146 2011 YLR 628
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 2057 of 2000, heard on 23rd November, 2010
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK AND MUHAMMAD ANWAARUL HAQ, JJ
Saleem Akram Chaudhry for Appellant. Chaudhry Muhammad Mustafa. Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State. Chaudhry Baleegh-uz-Zaman for the Complainant

Mst. AZRA TABASSUM

VS

THE STATE

Law:

Section:

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss.302/452---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.417(2-A), 249-A & 265-K--Qatl-e-amd and house-trespassing---Appeal against acquittal---Trial Court on date fixed on the application of accused persons filed under S.265-K, Cr.P.C., without recording any evidence had acquitted accused persons just relying on the findings of different Police Officers who in their investigation had found them innocent---Ipse dixit of the Police regarding guilt or innocence of accused was not admissible in evidence---Sufficient material was available on file. to proceed with the trial against accused persons---Twelve prosecution witnesses had joined the investigation and their statements under 5.161, Cr.P.C. had also been recorded by the Investigating Officer---Evidence so recorded prima facie contained the material which connected accused with the crime---Verdict of Trial Court regarding the acquittal of accused persons without recording of all that evidence, was premature in the circumstances of the case---Trial Court no doubt had jurisdiction to acquit an accused at any stage of the case on the relevant provision of law was very much clear on the subject, but it was also well settled that S.249-A and S.265-K, Cr.P.C. were an exception to the general rule---Said provisions being of utmost importance had to be construed very strictly---Depriving a complainant to prove his case through the evidence, collected during the investigation without strong and exceptional reasons, was not proper and fair exercise of jurisdiction---Acquittal of accused persons in the case under S.265-K, Cr.P.C., was unwarranted and not tenable, in circumstances---Judgment passed by the Trial Court was set aside and case was remanded to the Trial Court to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ANWAARUL HAQ, J.---This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14-11-2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kharian, District Gujrat, whereby, respondents Nos. 2 to 5 were acquitted under section 265-K, Cr.P.C. from case F.I.R. No. 217 dated 20-4-1998, under sections 302/452, P.P.C. read with section 34, P.P.C., Police Station…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492