| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 3098 2012 SLD 3098 2012 PLD 28 |
High Court (AJ&K)
W.P. Nos. 200 of 2006 and 59 of 2007, decided on 12th March, 2012.
MUNIR AHMED CHAUDHARY, JUSTICE
Shaheen Asad v. Azfar Yaseen and others 2000 SCR 308 rel. Muhammad Riaz Tabassum for Petitioners. Ch. Muhammad Taj and Ch. Bostan for
Respondents. Date of decision: 12th March, 2012.
W.P. Nos. 200 of 2006 and 59 of 2007, decided on 12th March, 2012.
MUNIR AHMED CHAUDHARY, JUSTICE
Shaheen Asad v. Azfar Yaseen and others 2000 SCR 308 rel. Muhammad Riaz Tabassum for Petitioners. Ch. Muhammad Taj and Ch. Bostan for
Respondents. Date of decision: 12th March, 2012.
MIAN MUMTAZ AKHTAR AND anotherS
VS
AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL SECRETARIAT THROUGH SECRETARY AND others
Law:
Section:
(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir State Subjects Act, 1980---.--- ---.----S. 4---.---Azad Jammu, and Kashmir State Subject Certificate (Cancellation) Act (IX of 1971), S.3---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir State Subjects Rules, R.6---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, S.44---.---Writ petition---.---State Subject Certificate---.---Report of Member, Board of Revenue recommending cancellation Of such certificate issued to the petitioner---.---Show cause notice issued to petitioner on basis of such report by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council---.---Validity---.---Azad Jantntu and Kashmir Council had ample power to deprive any person of such Certificate alleged to have obtained same by means of fraud, false representation or concealment of any material fact and could issue such notice either on basis of report of Government or on its own motion---.---Only Board constituted under S.3 ofAzad Jammu and Kashmir State Subject Certificate (Cancellation) Act, 1971 could probe into such, matter---.---Such Board had not yet been constituted, in the present case, resultantly inquiry could not yet be conducted under Azad Jammu and Kashmir State Subject Certificate (Cancellation) Act, 1971---.---According to Rules of Business (AJ&K) all Secretaries to Government for being part and parcel of Government, act on behalf of Government while deciding matters or performing functions in matters regarding their respective Departments---.---Such report/recommendation forwarded to the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council by Board of Revenue would be considered as forwarded by Government---.---Such report contained facts found by concerned authority and was not an inquiry for purpose of passing a final order-Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council had yet to inquiry such matter after hearing the petitioner---.---Petitioner could apply for appointment of Committee for inquiry and produce evidence before the same---.---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council had issued the impugned notice in accordance with law---.---Show cause, if processed in accordance with a lawful authority, could not he challenged in writ jurisdiction---.---Petitioner had an alternate remedy and opportunity to be heard before the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492