| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 2210 2011 SLD 2210 2011 SCMR 1322 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 3394-L of 2004, decision dated: 30-06-2009 (Against judgment dated 15-10-2004 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Civil Revision No. 2037 of 2002)
MIAN HAMID FAROOQ AND SYED SAKHI HUSSAIN BUKHARI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition No. 3394-L of 2004, decision dated: 30-06-2009 (Against judgment dated 15-10-2004 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Civil Revision No. 2037 of 2002)
MIAN HAMID FAROOQ AND SYED SAKHI HUSSAIN BUKHARI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MANZOOR AHMED and others
VS
. AURANGZEB
Law:
Section:
Punjab Pre-emption Act (IX of 1991)------S.13---Right of pre-emption---Talb-e-Muwathibat, making of---Plaint and evidence---Contradictions---Effect---Suit filed by pre-emptor was concurrently decreed in his favour by all three courts below---Plea raised by vendees was that there was contradiction in plaint and evidence regarding time and place of making of Talb-e-Muwathibat---Validity---Stance of pre-emptor was contradictory, inasmuch as, in plaint it was alleged that he performed Talb-e-Muwathibat on 28-8-1995, in presence of a witness but while appearing as witness, pre-emptor stated that Talb-e-Muwathibat was performed on 5-9-1995, in presence of Patwari---Such two statements were irreconcilable as two different dates for performance of Talbs were pleaded by pre-emptor---Issue relating to Talbs could not have been decided in favour of pre-emptor in view of his contradictory stance---None of the courts below adverted to such material and crucial aspect of the case which could have only decided fate of suit---High Court only relied upon statement of pre-emptor and completely ignored his stance initially taken in the plaint---All the courts below decided the matter in complete oblivion of record of case and High Court mechanically affirmed findings of two courts on the ground that those were concurrent---All the courts completely misread the record of the case and Supreme Court reversed s and decrees of all three courts---Supreme Court converted petition for leave to appeal into appeal and dismissed the suit filed by pre-emptor---Appeal was allowed. Saif-ul-Haq Ziay, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Ch. M. Yaqoob Sandhu, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent. Date of hearing: 30th June, 2009. ORDER MIAN HAMID FAROOQ, J.---Petitioners seek leave to appeal against judgment dated 15-10-2004, whereby the learned Lahore High Court at Lahore, dismissed their revision petition (Civil Revision No.2037 of 2002). 2. Respondent/plaintiff filed suit for possession through pre-emption thereby pre-empting the sale effected through Mutation No.424 dated 29-8-1995 favouring the petitioners qua the suit-land thereby claiming that they have superior rights and that they…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492