Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 2548 2024 SLD 2548 2024 YLR 328
Federal Shariat Court
Jail Criminal Appeal No. 3-I and Criminal Murder ReferenceNo. 2-I of 2021, decided on 14th May, 2022.Date of hearing:22nd December, 2021.
Before Muhammad Noor Meskanzai, C.J., Dr. Syed Muhammad Anwer and Khadim Hussain M. Shaikh, JJ
Mrs. Saleha Naeem Ghazala for Appellant. Syed Sikandar Ali Shah for the Complainant. Syed Zahoor Shah, Additional Prosecutor General, Sindh for the State.

SHOLO alias RASOOL BUX---Appellant

VERSUS

The STATE---Respondent

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

Per Muhammad Noor Meskanzai, CJ. [Minority view] (a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account supported by medical evidence---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused drove cattle of complainant party; son of complainant tried to grapple with them, on which accused fired at him and killed him---Ocular account was furnished by two witnesses, complainant and an eye-witness---Complainant narrated the facts in a natural way and supported the contents of FIR in letter and spirit---Lengthy cross-examination was conducted but the defence failed to shake and shatter the statement---No omission, contradiction or improvement could be brought on record---Similarly, other witness, who too was an eye-witness of the incident, supported complainant on each and every material aspect---During the course of cross-examination the witness stuck to his version despite lengthy cross-examination and nothing favourable to accused could be extracted---Medical Officer produced MLC and postmortem report which corroborated ocular account in as much as the witnesses deposed that the firing was made from a very short distance---Presence of blackening on entrance wound corroborated the ocular account---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Recovery of crime empties from the spot---Reliance---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused drove cattle of complainant party; son of complainant tried to grapple with them, on which accused fired at him and killed him---Although no recovery of crime weapon was effected as admittedly the convict was arrested after six years but nevertheless the recovery of empty shells from venue could not be overlooked---Recovery of empty shells of various kinds of weapons also corroborated the ocular account, inasmuch as, the accused were numerous and armed with different kinds of weapons---Except very minute and immaterial contradiction, the prosecution evidence was straight forward, coherent, confidence inspiring and did not suffer from any defect rendering it…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492