Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 3031 2024 SLD 3031 2024 SCMR 1096
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.394-P of 2010, decided on 15th March, 2024. (On appeal against the judgment dated 07.05.2010 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in C.R. No. 456 of 2009 with C.M. No. 691 of 2009). Date of hearing: 15th March, 2024.
PRESENT: QAZI FAEZ ISA, CJ, IRFAN SAADAT KHAN AND NAEEM AKHTAR AFGHAN, JJ
Abdul Sattar Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Zahoor Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for the Petitioners (Through video link from Peshawar). Ziaur Rehman Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 (Through video link from Peshawar) Nemo for Resp

MST. JEHAN BANO AND OTHERS---PETITIONERS

VS

MEHRABAN SHAH AND OTHERS---RESPONDENTS

Law:

Section:

(a) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)------S. 52---Land revenue record---Presumption of truth---Oral exchange of land---Proof---Inheritance mutation, legality of---According to section 52 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, presumption of truth is attached to the entries made in the periodical record of rights i.e. jamabandis/khasra girdawari until contrary is proved---In the present case the jamabandis of the years 1949-50, 1953-54, 1957-58, 1969-70 and 2001-02 as well as khasra girdawari reveal that the exchange of pieces of land by the predecessor of the parties was given effect in the periodical record of rights by entering their names in the column of cultivators---After death of their predecessor, the names of respondents Nos. 1 to 3 were also entered in the column of cultivators for the suit land in the jamabandis/khasra girdawari of different years which were not challenged by the predecessor of the petitioners in his lifetime as well as by the petitioners till filing of civil suit by the respondents in March 2005---Petitioners failed to rebut the presumption of truth attached with the long standing jamabandis/khasra girdawari for the suit land existing in the names of respondents Nos. 1 to 3 due to exchange transaction---On the contrary, apart from producing confidence inspiring oral evidence, the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have also proved the exchange transaction through the exchange deed dated 01.10.1980 which bears thumb impressions of the predecessor of petitioners and his brother, the signatures of respondent No. 1, respondent No. 3 and thumb impression of respondent No. 2---Taking undue advantage of the existence of the name of their predecessor in the column of ownership for the suit land in the jamabandis, after his death, the petitioners managed impugned inheritance mutation dated 21.04.1991 in their names by concealing the factum of exchange of the suit land as well as long standing cultivating possession of the respondents over the suit land since the year 1945---Appellate Court and Revisional Court had rightly decreed the suit of the respondents and dismissed that of the petitioners---Petition was dismissed and leave to…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492