Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2168 2023 SLD 2168 2023 CLD 1365
Islamabad High Court
C.S. No. 118 of 2016, decided on 27th September, 2023.Dateof hearing: 13th September, 2023.
Before Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J
Barrister Aleem O. Shahid and Fazal Maula for Applicant. Rizwan Faiz Muhammad and Muhammad Afzal Shinwari for
Respondent. Assisted by Barrister M. Usama Rauf, Law Clerk.

CHINA WATER AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION (CWE) P.R. CHINA---Applicant

VERSUS

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD---Respondent

Law: Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Ordinance, 2011

Section: 6(1)

Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act (XVII of 2011)--- ----S. 6(1)---United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 (New York Convention), Art. V(1)(e)--- International Chamber of Commerce Rules of Arbitration, Art. 35(6)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 117 & 120---Interim arbitration award---Scope---Enforcement of award---Proof---Onus to prove---Applicant company sought recovery of interim arbitration award passed in its favour and against respondent/National Highway Authority---Contention of respondent/Authority was that interim award was not enforceable---Validity---In order to be recognized and enforced under Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, an award must be (i) an arbitral award for the purposes of New York Convention; and (ii) a foreign arbitral award within the meaning of Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011---Interim Award satisfied both the requirements---No distinction between interim awards and final awards was made under the provisions of Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011 and New York Convention---High Court could refuse recognition and enforcement under Art. V(1)(e) of New York Convention of such foreign arbitral award that had not yet become binding on the parties---Interim Award in question was not conditional or contingent on materialization of an eventuality in order for it to become binding---Until Interim Award was set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which it was made, such interim award remained binding on the parties---By agreeing for arbitration to be conducted in accordance with Rules of Arbitration of International Chamber of Commerce, parties had in effect agreed that Interim Award was binding on them---Every award was binding on parties under Art. 35(6) of International Chamber of Commerce Rules of Arbitration---By submitting dispute to arbitration under Rules of Arbitration of International Chamber of Commerce,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492