| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 2261 2023 SLD 2261 2023 YLR 2691 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 220 and Writ Petition No. 5874 of 2012, decided on 15th May, 2023.Date of hearing: 15th May, 2023.
Before Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, J
Tahir Munir Malik for Appellants. Malik Suleman Awan and Mian Muhammad Salman Idrees for
Respondents. Ikraam Ullah Khan Niazi, Deputy Prosecutor General and Ms. Khalida Parveen Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 220 and Writ Petition No. 5874 of 2012, decided on 15th May, 2023.Date of hearing: 15th May, 2023.
Before Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, J
Tahir Munir Malik for Appellants. Malik Suleman Awan and Mian Muhammad Salman Idrees for
Respondents. Ikraam Ullah Khan Niazi, Deputy Prosecutor General and Ms. Khalida Parveen Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for the State.
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM and 4 others---Appellants
VERSUS
The STATE and others---Respondents
Law: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005
Section: 3,4
Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)--- ----Ss. 3 & 4---Prevention of illegal dispossession of property---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Allegation against the accused persons was that they took over the possession of land of the complainant forcibly and illegally---Admitted fact that the alleged occurrence was stated to be occured on 03.08.2010 at about 11:00 a.m. and admittedly, the complainant had himself filed suit for specific performance regarding the suit property on 29.10.2004 whereas the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 was promulgated in the year 2005, therefore, the dispute in respect of land was already pending adjudication before promulgation of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005---Admittedly, certified copy of Khasra Girdawari did not bear signatures of circle Patwari---Admittedly, the accused persons were co-sharers in the Khata and mutation in that regard was also available on file---Co-sharer was presumed to be in possession of each and every inch of joint property---Thus, applicability of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, in such a case required extraordinary circumstances, which were very much lacking in present case---Nothing was on record which could establish any link of the accused persons with land grabbers or qabza mafia---Further, complainant admitted that at present, possession of the disputed land was with him and after decreeing of civil suit in his favour, accused persons preferred Civil Revision which was pending adjudication before the Court---Dispute, prima facie, appeared to be between co-sharers/co-owners---Position, being so, brought the case of the accused persons out of the purview of S. 3 the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. Waqar Ali and others v. The State through Prosecutor/ Advocate-General, Peshawar and others PLD 2011 SC 181 and Habibullah v. Abdul Manan 2012 SCMR 1533 rel. JUDGMENT SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, J.---This judgment shall dispose of captioned criminal appeal as well as writ petition. For convenience, Tariq Ali shall be here-in-after referred as "complainant" whereas Muhammad Ibrahim, etc., shall be hereinafter referred as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492