| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 5 2024 SLD 5 2024 PTD 49 |
SINDH HIGH COURT
C.P. No.8569 of 2018 (along with connected petitions),decided on 28th February, 2023. Dates of hearing: 14th,15th, 16th, 22nd, 23rd, 27th and 28th February, 2023.
PRESENT: MUHAMMAD JUNAID GHAFFAR AND AGHA FAISAL, JJ
Jam Zeeshan, Khalid Javed Khan, Farogh Naseem, Ovais Ali Shah, Rashid Anwar, Uzair Qadir Shoro, Umer Akhund, Marium Riaz, Umer Ilyas Khan, Fizzah Bucha, Ameer Haider Khan, Sami-ur-Rehman Khan, Fahad Khan, Ahmed Hussain, Imran Iqbal Khan, Adil Saeed, Salma
C.P. No.8569 of 2018 (along with connected petitions),decided on 28th February, 2023. Dates of hearing: 14th,15th, 16th, 22nd, 23rd, 27th and 28th February, 2023.
PRESENT: MUHAMMAD JUNAID GHAFFAR AND AGHA FAISAL, JJ
Jam Zeeshan, Khalid Javed Khan, Farogh Naseem, Ovais Ali Shah, Rashid Anwar, Uzair Qadir Shoro, Umer Akhund, Marium Riaz, Umer Ilyas Khan, Fizzah Bucha, Ameer Haider Khan, Sami-ur-Rehman Khan, Fahad Khan, Ahmed Hussain, Imran Iqbal Khan, Adil Saeed, Salma
INTERNATIONAL BRANDS LIMITED AND OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS (And connected matters, particularized in the Schedule1 hereto.)
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 59AA,59B
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 59AA, 59B, Second Sched., Cls. 103A & 103C---Group relief, benefit of---Petitioners / taxpayers claimed that since Cl. 103A in Second Schedule to Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, in its original form, extended benefit to qualifying entities under Ss. 59AA & 59B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefore, excising S.59B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefrom amounted to discrimination---Validity---It was prerogative of Parliament to confer and withdraw fiscal benefits, in the interests of public at large---Petitioners / taxpayer failed to prove any irrevocable entwining of Cl. 103A of Second Schedule with S. 59B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---There was no discrimination as the exemption could not subsist during tenancy of S.59B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Certain benefits under S.59AA of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, were extended to holding companies and hundred percent owned subsidiaries to be taxed as one fiscal unit---No concept of one fiscal unit existed in S. 59B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, wherein benefits including surrendering of losses was offered to qualifying holding / subsidiary companies---Upon the anvil of intelligible differentia categorization in each provision was demonstrably mutually exclusive---Petitioners / taxpayer did not have any case for discrimination---Provision of Cl. 103C was added to Second Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 vide Finance Act, 2019 and was omitted therefrom vide Finance Act, 2021---During the subsistence of Cl. 103C to Second Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, inter-corporate dividends were once again given tax exemption---No exemption under S. 54 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was to be considered in respect of taxation unless provided for in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---No exemption in respect of inter-corporate dividends was available to petitioners / taxpayers as they had availed benefit of relevant exemption during its tenancy---High Court declined to interfere in the matter as no case was made out to perpetuate the benefit ad infinitum especially post conscious withdrawal of such benefit by the Parliament---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492