| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 2305 2023 SLD 2305 2023 PTD 1662 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
I.T.A. No. 3880/LB/2023, decided on 2nd August, 2023, date of hearing: 31st July, 2023.
PRESENT: NASIR MAHMUD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RIZWAN AHMED URFI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Muhammad Hamza Sheikh for Appellant. Yousaf Ismail, DR for
Respondent.
I.T.A. No. 3880/LB/2023, decided on 2nd August, 2023, date of hearing: 31st July, 2023.
PRESENT: NASIR MAHMUD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RIZWAN AHMED URFI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Muhammad Hamza Sheikh for Appellant. Yousaf Ismail, DR for
Respondent.
MIAN FEROZE SALAH UD DIN
VS
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, RTO, LAHORE
Law: Income Tax Rules, 2001
Section: 121(3),131,132,121
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--Ss. 121(3) & 131âBest judgment assessmentâLimitationâScopeâ Order passed by the Officer Inland Revenue against the taxpayer was confirmed by the Commissioner AppealsâObjection of the appellant / taxpayer was that the order passed by the Officer Inland Revenue was barred by time as the order under S. 121 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (âOrdinance, 2001)could legally be passed within 5 years after the end of the tax year and/or the income yearâValidityâRecord revealed that the Commissioner Appeals had rejected the said objection (regarding limitation) without discussing or determining the dates relevant for determination of question of limitationâWhen limitation as a moot point was asserted in any litigation, the same had to be decided on the basis of facts and lawâTax year-in-issue was 2017 and the limitation to adjudicate under S.121 of the Ordinance, 2001 ended on 30-06-2022 whereas, admittedly, the order under S. 121 of the Ordinance, 2001, in the present case, was passed by the Officer Inland Revenue on 28-02-2023, thus the same was beyond period of limitation as prescribed under S. 121(3) of the Ordinance, 2001âIssue of limitation was not a technicality which could not be ignoredâTribunal set-aside both the orders passed by the Officer Inland Revenue as well as the Commissioner AppealsâAppeal filed by the taxpayer was allowed, in circumstances. Additional CIR v. M/s. Eden Builders Ltd. and others 2018 SCMR 991; Asad Ali v. The Bank of Punjab PLD 2020 SC 736 and Dr. Muhammad Javaid Shafi v. Syed Arshad and others PLD 2015 SC 212 ref. (b) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--Ss.132, 131 & 121âConstitution of Pakistan, Art. 189âJudgments of the Supreme CourtâBinding on all CourtsâBest judgment assessmentâLimitationâOfficer Inland Revenue passed order against the taxpayer after passing of 5 years of relevant tax-year, however, the same was confirmed by the Commissioner AppealsâContention of the appellant / taxpayer was that the order passed by the Officer Inland Revenue was barred by time as the Supreme Court had held that the order under S. 121 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (âOrdinance, 2001 â) could legally beâŠ
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492