| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 2802 2024 SLD 2802 2024 PCRLJ 370 |
Sindh High Court, Hyderabad Bench
Criminal Appeals Nos. D-74, D-83 and Criminal Jail AppealNo. D-84 of 2020, decided on 31st May, 2022.Date of hearing:20th April, 2022.
Before Salahuddin Panhwar and Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, JJ
Ghulamullah Chang for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No.D-74 of 2020). Sahib Khan Panhwar for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No.D-83 of 2020). Mir Ali Bakhsh Talpur for Appellant (in Criminal Jail Appeal No.D-84 of 2020). Shahnawaz Brohi, Special Prosecutor
Criminal Appeals Nos. D-74, D-83 and Criminal Jail AppealNo. D-84 of 2020, decided on 31st May, 2022.Date of hearing:20th April, 2022.
Before Salahuddin Panhwar and Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, JJ
Ghulamullah Chang for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No.D-74 of 2020). Sahib Khan Panhwar for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No.D-83 of 2020). Mir Ali Bakhsh Talpur for Appellant (in Criminal Jail Appeal No.D-84 of 2020). Shahnawaz Brohi, Special Prosecutor
MIR MUHAMMAD and others---Appellants
VS
The STATE---Respondent
Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997
Section: 9(c)
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 103
(a) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 103---Possession of narcotic---Appreciation of evidence---Search and arrest, mode of---Non-association of private witnesses---Effect---Twenty eight kilograms charas was recovered from the vehicle of the accused persons---Contention of the accused was that no private person was joined in recovery proceedings except Police Officials, which was a violation of S. 103, Cr.P.C.---Validity---As per FIR the complainant party was available at police station where spy appeared and gave information about the offence and when the police party reached near a petrol pump they saw the present accused persons coming in a car; they got it stopped and apprehended the accused and recovered 28 kilograms of charas from their possession---However, it had come in evidence that the accused were arrested from near a petrol pump leading road, which was a thickly populated area and the complainant had sufficient time to call the independent persons of the locality to witness the recovery proceedings but it was not done by him for reasons best known to him and only the police officials who being subordinates to him were made as mashirs of arrest and recovery proceedings---Admittedly, judicial approach had to be conscious in dealing with cases in which entire testimony hinged upon the evidence of Police Officials alone---Provisions of S. 103, Cr.P.C., were not attracted to cases of personal search of accused in narcotic cases but where the alleged recovery was made on a road (as had happened in this case), omission to secure independent mashirs, particularly, in police case could not be brushed aside lightly by the court---No explanation on record was available as to why no independent person either from the place where they received spy information or from the place of incident had been joined to witness the recovery proceedings though it was a day time incident---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. 2019 SCMR 326; 2019 SCMR 1102; SBLR 2018 Sindh 1286; SBLR 2019…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492