| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 126 2023 SLD 126 2023 SCMR 364 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition No. 167-K of 2022, decided on 28th December, 2022. (On appeal against the order Dated 27.10.2022 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, Larkana in Criminal Bail Application No. S-232 of 2022)
JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND SYED HASAN AZHAR RIZVI, JJ
Muhammad Sachal R. Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Complainant in person. Hussain Bux Baloch, Additional Prosecutor General, Sindh for the State.
Criminal Petition No. 167-K of 2022, decided on 28th December, 2022. (On appeal against the order Dated 27.10.2022 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, Larkana in Criminal Bail Application No. S-232 of 2022)
JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR AND SYED HASAN AZHAR RIZVI, JJ
Muhammad Sachal R. Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Complainant in person. Hussain Bux Baloch, Additional Prosecutor General, Sindh for the State.
FAHAD HUSSAIN and another
VS
STATE through Prosecutor General Sindh
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 498,497(2),497(1)
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302,24
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3)
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 498, 497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 34---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Ad interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of---Further inquiry---According to the FIR, the incident occurred on 11.4.2022, while the FIR was lodged by the complainant on 20.4.2022---Though the complainant attributed the cause of delay to the police that after some protest the FIR was lodged but no details of the alleged protest were mentioned---Complainant has narrated in the FIR that when he along with his mother and brother reached the house of his deceased sister, they heard hue and cry from her room and when they entered the room, the accused was asphyxiating her, while the two co-accused persons were holding her hands and feet; that upon seeing this the complainant and his brother and mother raised cries which attracted villagers due to which the accused persons left the house, however no name of any villager was mentioned in the FIR who came to the scene of crime---Nothing was mentioned in the FIR that despite presence of the complainant and his brother along with the mother at the crime scene, whether any efforts were made by them to overpower the culprits in order to save the life of the deceased---According to the complainant, the post-mortem could not be conducted due to the non-availability of a lady doctor, hence the deceased was buried without conducting a post-mortem---On the contrary, according to the interim report filed under section 173, Cr.P.C, parents of the deceased mentioned the incident as a suicide, and it was further mentioned that letter for postmortem was issued but the complainant and his brothers did not allow the doctor to conduct postmortem and thereafter, the parents of the deceased forcibly took the dead body from hospital and buried it without postmortem---Said interim report further stated that the complainant had not produced eye-witness of the case to record their statement hence investigation was not concluded---Special Medical Board constituted for the postmortem unanimously concluded that the cause of death of the exhumed dead body of the deceased…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492