Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 79 2024 SLD 79 2024 PLD 13 2024 PTD 196 130 TAX 287
Balochistan High Court
C. P. No. 2026 of 2022, decided on 31st May, 2023.Date ofhearing: 10th May, 2023.
Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Sardar Ahmed Haleemi, JJ
Atif Faizan Usto for Petitioner. Tahir Iqbal Khattak, Addl: A.G. for Official
Respondent. Jam Saka Dashti for
Respondent No.3.

Messrs SARA ENTERPRISES GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS through Proprietor ---Petitioner

VS

SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA and 2 others---Respondents

Law: Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015

Section: 4(2)(a)

(a) Balochistan Revenue Authority Act (VII of 2015)--- ----S. 4(2)(a) & Preamble---Prospective/Retrospective application of a new law---Scope---Payment of works, done in the year 1998, by the petitioner (government contractor) was finally decreed in the year 2019, however, the decretal amount was released after deducting 15% tax under the provisions of Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015---Petitioner invoked constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court against the said tax deduction---Validity---Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015 ('the Act 2015') came into force on 1st July 2015 whereas the matter-in-question was related to the works having already been done in the year 1998---According to the canons of constructions, every statute, including amendatory statute, is, prima facie prospective, unless it is given retrospective effect either expressly or by necessary implication---Statute is not to be applied retrospectively in the absence of express enactment or necessary intendment, especially where the Statute is to affect vested rights, past and closed transactions or facts or events that had already occurred---Said principles are attracted to fiscal Statutes which have to be construed strictly, for they tend to impose liability and are, therefore, burdensome (as opposed to beneficial legislation)---The Act 2015 had no retrospective effect whereas the dispute, in the present case, related to the fiscal year 1998---High Court set aside impugned order of deduction of 15% tax from the bill of the petitioner, declaring the same void ab initio for having been passed in the year 2019; and directed the Official respondents to refund the deducted amount to the petitioner---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Public Health Engineering, Peshawar and others v. Abdul Manan 2021 SCMR 1871; Sardar Sher Bahadar Khan v. Election Commission of Pakistan through Secretary, Election Commission, Islamabad and others PLD 2018 SC 97 and Mst, Sarwar Jan and others v. Mukhtar Ahmed and others PLD 2012 SC 217 ref. (b) Maxim--- ----'Nova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet, non praeteritis, principle…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492