| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 169 2023 SLD 169 2023 CLC 59 |
Islamabad High Court
R.F.A. No.629 of 2021, decided on 25th August, 2022. Dates of hearing: 1st March and 27th June, 2022.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, J
Hazrat Wali Khattak for Appellants. Raja Muhammad Khan and Ahtesham Aslam Khan for
Respondents Nos.1, 5, 11, 17, 24, 25 and 26. Hafiz Farman Ullah for
Respondents Nos.21, 22 and 24.
R.F.A. No.629 of 2021, decided on 25th August, 2022. Dates of hearing: 1st March and 27th June, 2022.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, J
Hazrat Wali Khattak for Appellants. Raja Muhammad Khan and Ahtesham Aslam Khan for
Respondents Nos.1, 5, 11, 17, 24, 25 and 26. Hafiz Farman Ullah for
Respondents Nos.21, 22 and 24.
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS and others
VS
AKHTAR HUSSAIN and others
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42,54
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss.42, 54---Suit for declaration and injunction---Contractual liability---Terms and conditions of contract---Tentative price quoted in a brochure---Respondents/plaintiffs assailed letter issued by defendant Pakistan Housing Authority (PHA) raising extra demand towards final consideration amount of houses in question---Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of respondents / plaintiffs and directed defendant / Authority to hand over possession to respondents / plaintiffs without payment of extra money--- Validity--- Relationship between appellant / PHA and respondents / plaintiffs was contractual in nature---Provisions of brochure issued by PHA and terms and conditions attached with application forms were of binding contractual force on the parties---Court could not alter terms of contract or rewrite contract or create a new contract between the parties---Contract was to be read as a whole and not be dissected---Terms of contract were to be construed strictly without altering nature of the contract---Respondents / plaintiffs were put on notice that prices quoted in brochure were tentative and were liable to be revised--- Respondents / plaintiffs applied for apartments under the Project, entered contractual realm and could not then make a grievance of revised rates--- Appellant / PHA had a responsibility to act fairly and reasonably while fixing price for sale of apartments belonging to it--- Direction given by Trial Court to appellant / PHA to give possession of apartments to respondents / plaintiffs without demanding additional cost had effect of directing PHA to sell them at a price that could result in a loss to it--- Demand of appellant / Authority was not something contrary to contract between parties and was envisaged by terms and conditions of the brochure---High Court set aside and decree passed by Trial Court---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances. Abdul Waheed v. Additional District Judge PLD 2021 Lah. 453; Pakistan Real Estate Investment and Management Company (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Sky Blue Builders 2021 CLD 518; Pakk U.K. Association (Pvt.) Ltd. v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 2017 CLC 599; Montage Design Build v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492