| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 1722 2023 MLD 838 2023 SLD 1722 |
Lahore High Court
Date of hearing: 1st February, 2022.
Before Shahid Bilal Hassan, J
Shazib Masud and Mirza Nasar Ahmad for Petitioner. Mian Muhammad Hussain Chotiya and Adnan Naseer Chohan for
Respondent.
Date of hearing: 1st February, 2022.
Before Shahid Bilal Hassan, J
Shazib Masud and Mirza Nasar Ahmad for Petitioner. Mian Muhammad Hussain Chotiya and Adnan Naseer Chohan for
Respondent.
Messrs PREMIUM DEVELOPERS through Chief Executive---Petitioner
VERSUS
MUHAMMAD TARIQ---Respondent
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 12,54
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 115
Civil Revision No. 74574 of 2019, decided on 11th March, 2022. (a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 12 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell and injunction---Balance consideration amount--- Determination--- Respondent/defendant/seller entered into agreement to sell his land with petitioner/plaintiff/buyer and after receiving earnest money did not conclude the sale---Petitioner/plaintiff/buyer claimed to have complied with all conditions of agreement---Validity---Agreement inter se the parties was a bilateral agreement and in a bilateral agreement, participating parties promised each other that they would perform or refrain from performing an act---Remaining amount of 1st installment of 25% of agreed sale consideration was to be paid by petitioner/plaintiff/buyer to the respondent/defendant/seller after finalization of actual recovery of the seller as it was remaining sale amount of already sold residential and commercial units of the Scheme upon providence of sales record along with and that of actual measurement of remaining available immovable assets of the Scheme---Nothing was on record to suggest that respondent/defendant/seller fulfilled his part of the agreement in such regard by providing detail of already sold units, residential and commercial, by providing sale records as well as actual measurement of remaining available immovable assets of the scheme---Without calculation of already sold units and received amount there-against actual sale price could not be determined and petitioner/plaintiff/buyer could not be directed to deposit entire agreed sale price as agreement in question was bilateral in nature, binding the parties to perform their parts step by step---High Court set aside order of Trial Court as the Court while passing order in question was not sure whether ordered amount was balance amount or not---Revision was allowed accordingly. 2017 SCMR 2022; Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry v. Learned Civil Judge and others 2020 CLC 291 and Muhammad Asif Awan v. Dawood Khan and others 2021 SCMR 1270 ref. (b) Interpretation of document--- ----Agreement to sell---Scope---Agreement to sell as a…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492