| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 1130 2023 SLD 1130 2023 MLD 629 |
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Jail Appeals Nos. 31, 281 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 19 of 2021, decided on 24th Date of hearing: 15th March, 2022. March, 2022.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI AND ABDULLAH BALOCH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Jail Appeals Nos. 31, 281 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 19 of 2021, decided on 24th Date of hearing: 15th March, 2022. March, 2022.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI AND ABDULLAH BALOCH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD AYAZ
VS
The STATE
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b),109,34
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 109 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Motive behind the occurrence was stated to be a dispute over a relation between the deceased and family of accused to which the arbitrators tried to resolve the matter, but the accused murdered the deceased---Comparative study of direct evidence produced through eye-witnesses while the circumstantial evidence produced through other two witnesses established the fact that the accused due to matrimonial dispute committed the murder of deceased---Eye-witnesses were in line with each other giving each and every detail of the occurrence---Said witnesses remained consistent in their testimonies---Both the eye-witnesses correctly identified the accused in the Trial Court as assailant, who committed the murder of deceased through pistol---Both the said witnesses correctly stated the date, time and the place of occurrence as well as the manner, in which the occurrence had taken place---Testimonies of said witnesses were tested through cross-examination by the defence, but they remained consistent in their statements and the prosecution had failed to give any slightest dent or jolt to their testimonies---Besides, the occurrence had taken place during the day light, thus there was no occasion for mistaken identity of the accused---Complainant being the real brother of deceased would never raise his finger on innocent leaving the actual and real culprits scot-free, who committed the murder of his brother---Circumstances established that the prosecution had succeeded in proving the charge against the accused through direct, circumstantial and medical evidence---Appeal being devoid of merits, was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 109 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Related and interested witness---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Allegedly, one of the eye-witnesses was interested witness and the case of prosecution was lacking…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492