Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 1130 2023 SLD 1130 2023 MLD 629
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Jail Appeals Nos. 31, 281 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 19 of 2021, decided on 24th Date of hearing: 15th March, 2022. March, 2022.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI AND ABDULLAH BALOCH, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD AYAZ

VS

The STATE

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b),109,34

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 109 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Motive behind the occurrence was stated to be a dispute over a relation between the deceased and family of accused to which the arbitrators tried to resolve the matter, but the accused murdered the deceased---Comparative study of direct evidence produced through eye-witnesses while the circumstantial evidence produced through other two witnesses established the fact that the accused due to matrimonial dispute committed the murder of deceased---Eye-witnesses were in line with each other giving each and every detail of the occurrence---Said witnesses remained consistent in their testimonies---Both the eye-witnesses correctly identified the accused in the Trial Court as assailant, who committed the murder of deceased through pistol---Both the said witnesses correctly stated the date, time and the place of occurrence as well as the manner, in which the occurrence had taken place---Testimonies of said witnesses were tested through cross-examination by the defence, but they remained consistent in their statements and the prosecution had failed to give any slightest dent or jolt to their testimonies---Besides, the occurrence had taken place during the day light, thus there was no occasion for mistaken identity of the accused---Complainant being the real brother of deceased would never raise his finger on innocent leaving the actual and real culprits scot-free, who committed the murder of his brother---Circumstances established that the prosecution had succeeded in proving the charge against the accused through direct, circumstantial and medical evidence---Appeal being devoid of merits, was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 109 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Related and interested witness---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Allegedly, one of the eye-witnesses was interested witness and the case of prosecution was lacking…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492