| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 173 2024 SLD 173 2024 PCRLJ 113 |
Islamabad High Court
I.C.A. No. 236 of 2023, decided on 30th August, 2023. Date of hearing: 30th August, 2023.
Before Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Arbab Muhammad Tahir, JJ
Sardar Abdul Raziq Khan, Irfan Javed Abbasi, Sh. Moazin Rashid, Sardar Shahbaz Khan and Umair Shafiq Mughal for Appellant. Hazrat Younus, State Counsel for
Respondents. Tahir Kazmi, Head Law Officer, for ICT Police. Shafqat Faiz, SHO P.S. Kohsar and Ta
I.C.A. No. 236 of 2023, decided on 30th August, 2023. Date of hearing: 30th August, 2023.
Before Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Arbab Muhammad Tahir, JJ
Sardar Abdul Raziq Khan, Irfan Javed Abbasi, Sh. Moazin Rashid, Sardar Shahbaz Khan and Umair Shafiq Mughal for Appellant. Hazrat Younus, State Counsel for
Respondents. Tahir Kazmi, Head Law Officer, for ICT Police. Shafqat Faiz, SHO P.S. Kohsar and Ta
Sheikh RASHEED AHMED---Appellant
VS
SHO POLICE STATION KOHSAR, ISLAMABAD and 2 others---Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 516-A,550
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 516-A--- Case property--- Necessary ingredients--- Scope---Expressions "interim custody", "interim disposal" and "Superdari" are interchangeably used in criminal procedural law---Essential features of term "case property" are that (i) it should have been used in commission of offence, (ii) offence appears to have been committed in respect of such property, (iii) it is the property which was stolen and then recovered from accused persons, and (iv) it itself is evidence of commission of offence. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 516-A & 550---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199--- Case property---Custody of vehicles---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Alternate remedy---Principle---Appellant/accused was aggrieved of seizing of his vehicles by police as case property---Validity---Public functionaries cannot be allowed to manipulate lawful process through deliberate illegal actions and strangulate the constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under the garb of availability of alternate remedies and ultimately put victims of such illegal actions to face rigors of cumbersome legal process before various other forums---Illegal and unlawful acts of public functionaries cannot be allowed to perpetuate merely on the ground of availability of alternative remedies---Respondent/Incharge Police Station was aware that there was no order of attachment of property of appellant/accused under S. 88, Cr.P.C. and the property was not used in commission of offence---Respondent/ Incharge Police Station initially seized vehicles under S. 550, Cr.P.C. and later after realizing legal complications, managed to make vehicles as case property---Such action of respondent/Incharge Police Station was not backed by any valid reason---High Court declared that seizure of vehicles by respondent/Incharge Police Station was without lawful authority and the same was struck down---Division Bench of High Court directed respondent/Incharge Police Station to return vehicles to the premises from where they were seized and order passed by Judge in Chambers of High Court was set aside---Intra Court Appeal was allowed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492