Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 208 2023 SLD 208 2023 CLC 355
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Multan Bench
Civil Revision No.213-D of 2004, decided on 25th October, 2021. Date of hearing: 25th October, 2021.
AHMAD NADEEM ARSHAD, J
Muhammad Khalid Khan Sikhani for Petitioners. Muhammad Salman Bashir and Syed Jahanzeb Bukhari for
Respondents Nos.1, 3-a and 5. Syed Jaffar Tayyar Bukhari for
Respondent No.4. Rest of
Respondent : Ex parte vide order dated 21-11-2021.

GHULAM FARID and others

VS

AHMAD KHAN and others

Law: Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961

Section: 4

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--- ----S.4---Inheritance---Petitioners/grandchildren of deceased filed suit for declaration claiming entitlement of 7/128 share in his total legacy being legal heirs of pre-deceased daughter of deceased/propositus---Trial Court decreed the suit---Appellate Court allowed appeal of respondents/defendants---Petitioners contented that appellate Court wrongly held that mother of petitioners was predeceased from her father (i.e. in 1950) before enforcement of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961, hence, petitioners were not entitled to the share of inheritance of their grandfather; and that inheritance would open the moment the person died and deceased/propositus died in 1970 after promulgation of Ordinance, 1961---Held, that undeniably, under Islamic Sharia, predeceased children were not entitled to any inheritance as only the survivors to a deceased were entitled to inheritance---By virtue of S.4 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (promulgated on 15/07/1961), legal heirs of pre-deceased son/daughter of propositus would be entitled to inheritance on re-opening of the succession---Said S. 4 was declared un-Islamic by judgement of Federal Shariat Court in Allah Rakhas Case (PLD 2000 FSC 1) which judgement had been challenged by Government---Section 4 of the Ordinance, would remain in field till the decision of appeal by Shariat Appellate Bench of Supreme Court of Pakistan---Proposition that S.4 of the Ordinance, had no retrospective effect---Petitioners right of succession came into existence only on the death of propositus as at that time the Ordinance, was already in field and operative---Only requirement of S.4 was that succession should open after the Ordinance was brought into effect---Section 4 was made applicable when succession of propositus opened and it was an established principle of Islamic Law that the succession of a Muslim would open the moment he/she died---Limitation would not preclude a person to get his share from inheritance---Revision petition was allowed and suit of petitioners was decreed accordingly. Yusuf Abbas and others v. Mst. Ismat Mustafa and others PLD 1968 Kar. 480; Sakhi Muhammad v. Ahmad…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492