Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 181 2024 SLD 181 2024 PCRLJ 190
Balochistan High Court
Criminal (ATA) Appeals Nos. 66 and 71 of 2023, decided on 3rd May, 2023.Date of hearing: 27th April, 2023.
Before Muhammad Ejaz Swati and Nazeer Ahmed Langove, JJ
Amanullah Kanrani for Appellants (in Criminal (ATA) Appeal No. 66 of 2023). Habib-ur-Rehman Baloch and Muhammad Rashid Ayub for Appellant (in Criminal (ATA) Appeal No. 71 of 2023). Ms. Noor Jahan Kahoor, Additional P.G. for the State.

IBRAHIM alias TAIG and others---Appellants

VS

The STATE---Respondent

Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997

Section: 7,11-F

Law: Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Section: 4,5

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 103

(a) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 7 & 11-F---Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Ss. 4 & 5---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 103---Act of terrorism---Making or possessing explosives under suspicious circumstances---Membership, support and meetings relating to a Proscribed Organization---Search to be made in presence of witnesses---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Scope---Accused persons were convicted for having been found in possession of explosive substances---Despite prior information, the mandatory provisions of S. 103 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (Cr.P.C.) were not complied with, and no explanation was provided in this regard---Furthermore, there is no evidence on record indicating the involvement of the accused in terrorist activities or their status as previous convicts or hardened criminals---Accused did not resist the police raid nor provide any disclosure following the recovery or discovery of new facts permitted under Art. 40 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, nor did they make any confession---Father of an accused person had made a complaint to the Levies that his three sons were present at home, the security personnel came and abducted them on gunpoint, however, the Levies did not register any FIR---Trial Court had misread the evidence by holding that the prosecution had been able to prove its case against the accused; thus, the conclusion arrived at was not sustainable under the law and was liable to be reversed---Appeals were allowed and the impugned judgment was set aside. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 4, 9 & 14---Right of individuals to be dealt in accordance with law---Security of person---Inviolability of dignity of man---Right to liberty---Upholding human dignity and legal safeguards---Scope---Out of the legal rights, the right to liberty is placed on a higher pedestal, which is to be respected by all and sundry---This is because courts are the guardians of the liberties of the citizens---Even the worst criminal in society is entitled to legal safeguards, and his legal rights cannot be taken away on one pretext or the other---Article 4 of the Constitution also safeguards the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492